John Κ. Fairbank
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Political Science and International Relations top 1%
- Cultural Studies top 0.2%
- Anthropology top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Thomas A. MetzgerRichard J. SmithEdwin O. ReischauerMerle GoldmanSsǔ-yü TêngAlbert M. CraigChung‐Ying ChengArthur W. Hummel
- Topics
- Chinese history and philosophy (62 papers)Japanese History and Culture (8 papers)Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John Κ. Fairbank
130 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Sociology and Political Science 1.5k
- Political Science and International Relations 665
- Cultural Studies 441
- Anthropology 288
- Economics and Econometrics 261
Countries citing papers authored by John Κ. Fairbank
This map shows the geographic impact of John Κ. Fairbank's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Κ. Fairbank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Κ. Fairbank more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Κ. Fairbank
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Κ. Fairbank. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Κ. Fairbank. The network helps show where John Κ. Fairbank may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Κ. Fairbank
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Κ. Fairbank. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Κ. Fairbank based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Κ. Fairbank. John Κ. Fairbank is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 58 | |
| 3 | Revolutions within the Chinese Revolution, 1966-1982 | 1 |
| 4 | China : tradition & transformation | 10 |
| 5 | The emergence of revolutionary China, 1949-1965 | 1 |
| 6 | Republican China 1912-1949 | 3 |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | East Asia : tradition & transformation | 3 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 50 | |
| 13 | New views of China's tradition and modernization | 1 |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 71 | |
| 16 | Communist China 1955-1959: Policy Documents with Analysis | 15 |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Chʿing administration : three studies | 13 |
| 19 | 79 | |
| 20 | Der Kommunismus in China : eine Dokumentar-Geschichte | 0 |
About John Κ. Fairbank
John Κ. Fairbank is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 162 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (62 papers), Japanese History and Culture (8 papers) and Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (441 citations), Sociology and Political Science (1.5k citations) and Anthropology (288 citations). John Κ. Fairbank has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas A. Metzger, Richard J. Smith, Edwin O. Reischauer, Merle Goldman, Ssǔ-yü Têng, Albert M. Craig, Chung‐Ying Cheng, Arthur W. Hummel, Donald S. Zagoria and James E. Sheridan. Their work appears in journals such as American Sociological Review, American Political Science Review and Foreign Affairs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.