Thomas Green

2.4k citations
47 papers · 725 indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

    • Historical Studies of British Isles 3
    • Scottish History and National Identity 2

Thomas Green

42 papers receiving 647 citations

Peers

Thomas Green
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 91
  • Clinical Psychology 142
  • Linguistics and Language 30
  • Gender Studies 46
  • Social Psychology 95
Replace Rachel Simmons with:
Rachel Simmons United States
Evelynn M. Hammonds United States
Helen Davis United States
Andrea Smith United States
Mary E. Stafford United States
Kathleen Anderson United States
Jan Ν. Bremmer Brazil
Michael Lerner United States
Helen King United Kingdom
George W. Henry United States
Thomas Green relative to Rachel Simmons United States Rachel Simmons's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Rachel Simmons · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Green

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Green's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Green with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Green more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Green

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Green. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Green. The network helps show where Thomas Green may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Green, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Green Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Green links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20222
3 20223
4 20213
5 20211
6 20217
7 20202
8 20190
9 20194
10 20183
11 2018218
12 20176
13
Materialism and the Tendency to Worship Celebrities
201419
14
The British Kingdom of Lindsey
20081
15 20075
16 20031
17 20021
18 19913
19 198930
20 198596

About Thomas Green

Thomas Green is a scholar working on Classics, History, Literature and Literary Theory, Transplantation and Gender Studies, having authored 47 papers that have together received 725 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies of British Isles (3 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (3 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (3 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (3 papers), Nematode management and characterization studies (2 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (2 papers), Media Influence and Health (2 papers) and Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (91 citations), Clinical Psychology (142 citations), Linguistics and Language (30 citations), Gender Studies (46 citations) and Social Psychology (95 citations). Thomas Green has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Mary Ellen Lynch, John P. Hill, Grayson N. Holmbeck, Michael Kenstowicz, H.L. Garvin, E. Lipworth, John M. Krill-Burger, David E. Root, James M. McFarland and Francisca Vázquez. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Journal on Addictions, Nature Communications, The Journal of Legal History and International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026