Thomas Giel

488 citations
6 papers · 315 · 1 hit paper · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Giel

6 papers receiving 301 citations

Thomas Giel's Hit Papers

eSports – Competitive sports or recreational activity? 2017 · 254 citations
2540+3+6Years since publication50100150200250

Peers

Thomas Giel
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Gender Studies 80
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 79
  • Sociology and Political Science 237
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies 4
  • Information Systems and Management 15
Replace Michael B. Devlin with:
Michael B. Devlin United States
Eileen Kennedy United Kingdom
Simon Amez Belgium
Ian Ritchie Canada
Cem Çuhadar Türkiye
Nicholas Taylor Canada
Kathy Sanford Canada
Hamed Mubarak Al-Awidi Jordan
Tom Brock United Kingdom
Özlem Canan Güngören Türkiye
Thomas Giel relative to Michael B. Devlin United States Michael B. Devlin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
Michael B. Devlin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Giel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Giel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Giel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Giel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Giel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Giel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Giel. The network helps show where Thomas Giel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Giel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Giel Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Giel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown

About Thomas Giel

Thomas Giel is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Strategy and Management, having authored 6 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (3 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (2 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (2 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (2 papers), Digital Games and Media (1 paper), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (1 paper), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (1 paper) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (80 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (79 citations), Sociology and Political Science (237 citations), Life-span and Life-course Studies (4 citations) and Information Systems and Management (15 citations). Thomas Giel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Kirstin Hallmann, Christoph Breuer and Daniel Memmert. Their work appears in journals such as Sport Management Review, European Sport Management Quarterly, Soccer and Society, Journal of Sports Economics and Sport Business and Management An International Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact