Thomas E. Maher

460 total citations
20 papers, 201 citations indexed

About

Thomas E. Maher is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Strategy and Management and Organic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas E. Maher has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 201 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Molecular Biology, 5 papers in Strategy and Management and 4 papers in Organic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Thomas E. Maher's work include International Business and FDI (5 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (3 papers) and Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (2 papers). Thomas E. Maher is often cited by papers focused on International Business and FDI (5 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (3 papers) and Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (2 papers). Thomas E. Maher collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Thomas E. Maher's co-authors include Joel D. Nicholson, Yim‐Yu Wong, Sherriff T.K. Luk, George Lee, Marko Storch, Stephan A. Sieber, Heather J. Kulik, Ramón Vilar, B. Adinarayana and Gianmarco Terrones and has published in prestigious journals such as Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Nature Communications and Nature Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Thomas E. Maher

19 papers receiving 179 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas E. Maher United States 9 68 46 43 27 21 20 201
Antonio Navarro Spain 5 249 3.7× 21 0.5× 28 0.7× 48 1.8× 34 1.6× 6 367
Ryan Angus United States 7 126 1.9× 21 0.5× 30 0.7× 64 2.4× 44 2.1× 13 427
Carlo Bellavite Pellegrini Italy 8 29 0.4× 23 0.5× 17 0.4× 8 0.3× 10 0.5× 44 233
Ans Heirman Belgium 5 154 2.3× 11 0.2× 9 0.2× 59 2.2× 11 0.5× 8 392
Ralf Kopp Germany 7 14 0.2× 109 2.4× 10 0.2× 11 0.4× 8 0.4× 24 281
Albert Y. Wang United States 7 117 1.7× 10 0.2× 14 0.3× 25 0.9× 31 1.5× 15 529
Sabrina Schell Switzerland 11 53 0.8× 58 1.3× 10 0.2× 217 8.0× 18 0.9× 22 351
Fernanda Ribeiro Portugal 6 38 0.6× 16 0.3× 29 0.7× 5 0.2× 7 0.3× 49 190
Ruth Thomas United Kingdom 7 65 1.0× 86 1.9× 9 0.2× 32 1.2× 25 1.2× 16 282
Ligang Zhong Canada 8 126 1.9× 46 1.0× 6 0.1× 18 0.7× 27 1.3× 24 339

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Maher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Maher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Maher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Maher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Maher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Maher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Maher. The network helps show where Thomas E. Maher may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas E. Maher

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas E. Maher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas E. Maher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas E. Maher. Thomas E. Maher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zanon, Patrick R. A., Fengchao Yu, Patricia Z. Musacchio, et al.. (2025). Profiling the proteome-wide selectivity of diverse electrophiles. Nature Chemistry. 17(11). 1712–1721. 3 indexed citations
2.
Nuccio, Sabrina Pia, Enrico Cadoni, Thomas E. Maher, et al.. (2025). Chemically modified CRISPR-Cas9 enables targeting of individual G-quadruplex and i-motif structures, revealing ligand-dependent transcriptional perturbation. Nature Communications. 17(1). 385–385.
3.
Robinson, Jenna, Ian Garner, Thomas E. Maher, et al.. (2025). G-quadruplex structures regulate long-range transcriptional reprogramming to promote drug resistance in ovarian cancer cells. Genome biology. 26(1). 183–183. 1 indexed citations
4.
Terrones, Gianmarco, B. Adinarayana, Thomas E. Maher, et al.. (2024). A Semi‐Automated, High‐Throughput Approach for the Synthesis and Identification of Highly Photo‐Cytotoxic Iridium Complexes. Angewandte Chemie. 136(18). 2 indexed citations
5.
Terrones, Gianmarco, B. Adinarayana, Thomas E. Maher, et al.. (2024). A Semi‐Automated, High‐Throughput Approach for the Synthesis and Identification of Highly Photo‐Cytotoxic Iridium Complexes. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 63(18). e202401808–e202401808. 19 indexed citations
6.
Raguseo, Federica, Yiran Wang, Jessica Li, et al.. (2023). The ALS/FTD-related C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion forms RNA condensates through multimolecular G-quadruplexes. Nature Communications. 14(1). 8272–8272. 30 indexed citations
8.
Maher, Thomas E., et al.. (2022). Tailored Pyridoxal Probes Unravel Novel Cofactor‐Dependent Targets and Antibiotic Hits in Critical Bacterial Pathogens. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 61(24). e202117724–e202117724. 14 indexed citations
9.
Wong, Yim‐Yu, et al.. (2003). Organisational learning and the risks of technology transfers in China. Management Research News. 26(12). 1–11. 6 indexed citations
10.
Wong, Yim‐Yu, Thomas E. Maher, & Sherriff T.K. Luk. (2002). The hesitant transfer of strategic management knowledge to international joint ventures in China: greater willingness seems likely in the future. Management Research News. 25(1). 1–15. 9 indexed citations
11.
Wong, Yim‐Yu, Thomas E. Maher, & Sherriff T.K. Luk. (2002). The hesitant transfer of strategic management know‐how to foreign wholly owned subsidiaries in China. Management Research News. 25(11). 42–56. 2 indexed citations
12.
Wong, Yim‐Yu, et al.. (2001). Exploring Taiwan’s competitive advantages: present and future. Management Research News. 24(6/7). 17–24. 2 indexed citations
13.
Maher, Thomas E., et al.. (2000). Strategic alliances in logistics outsourcing. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. 12(4). 3–21. 46 indexed citations
14.
Wong, Yim‐Yu, et al.. (2000). Taiwan: a tiger increasingly at bay but still ferocious. Managerial Finance. 26(4). 3–15. 1 indexed citations
15.
Wong, Yim‐Yu, et al.. (1999). Strategies for Japan’s protected market: rice as a case in point. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. 11(4). 47–60. 1 indexed citations
16.
Maher, Thomas E., et al.. (1998). The Strategy of an Ancient Warrior: An Inspiration for International Managers. Multinational Business Review. 6(1). 83. 9 indexed citations
17.
Maher, Thomas E., et al.. (1998). Doing business with dragons of different breeds: some important differences between China and Japan. Management Research News. 21(4/5). 45–54. 11 indexed citations
18.
Maher, Thomas E., et al.. (1998). Neo‐confucianism: the bane of foreign firms in China. Management Research News. 21(1). 13–22. 20 indexed citations
19.
Maher, Thomas E., et al.. (1997). New key success factors for China's growing market. Business Horizons. 40(3). 43–52. 21 indexed citations
20.
Maher, Thomas E.. (1985). Lifetime employment in Japan: Exploding the myth. Business Horizons. 28(6). 23–26. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026