Thomas Blanchard

421 citations
17 papers · 145 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Blanchard

15 papers receiving 130 citations

Peers

Thomas Blanchard
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • History and Philosophy of Science 60
  • General Decision Sciences 15
  • Philosophy 38
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 29
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 33
Replace Michael T. Stuart with:
Michael T. Stuart Switzerland
Geoffrey Hunter United Kingdom
Luca Moretti United Kingdom
B Leuridan Belgium
William Roche United States
Ioannis Votsis Germany
Igal Kvart Israel
Matthew Mandelkern United States
Thomas Kroedel Germany
Delia Graff United States
Thomas Blanchard relative to Michael T. Stuart Switzerland Michael T. Stuart's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Michael T. Stuart · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Blanchard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Blanchard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Blanchard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Blanchard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Blanchard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Blanchard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Blanchard. The network helps show where Thomas Blanchard may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Blanchard, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Blanchard Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Blanchard links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201822
2 201722
3 201718
4 199218
5 201716
6 201814
7 201613
8 20178
9 20185
10 20232
11 20142
12 20212
13 20241
14 20151
15 20221
16 20220
17 20240

About Thomas Blanchard

Thomas Blanchard is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 145 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (11 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (4 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers) and Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (60 citations), General Decision Sciences (15 citations), Philosophy (38 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (29 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (33 citations). Thomas Blanchard has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Tania Lombrozo, Jonathan Schaffer, Shaun Nichols, Dylan Murray and Andreas Hüttemann. Their work appears in journals such as Cognitive Science, Philosophy of Science, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Philosophical Studies and Journal of the Early Republic.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact