Thomas Kroedel

430 citations
17 papers · 159 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Kroedel

15 papers receiving 139 citations

Peers

Thomas Kroedel
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • History and Philosophy of Science 58
  • Philosophy 98
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 100
  • General Decision Sciences 6
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 41
Replace Sara Bernstein with:
Sara Bernstein United States
Jeanne Peijnenburg Netherlands
Kevin Scharp United States
Sven Rosenkranz Spain
André Gallois Australia
Sinan Dogramaci United States
Jeffrey Sanford Russell United States
Josh Dever United States
Luca Moretti United Kingdom
Matjaž Potrč Slovenia
Thomas Kroedel relative to Sara Bernstein United States Sara Bernstein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sara Bernstein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Kroedel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Kroedel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Kroedel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Kroedel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Kroedel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Kroedel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Kroedel. The network helps show where Thomas Kroedel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Kroedel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Kroedel Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Kroedel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201323
2
Counterfactuals and the Epistemology of Modality
201220
3 200719
4 201218
5 201517
6 201117
7 20139
8 20147
9 20136
10
Mental Causation: A Counterfactual Theory
20196
11 20135
12 20195
13 20103
14 20172
15 20241
16 20171
17 20240

About Thomas Kroedel

Thomas Kroedel is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 159 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (8 papers), Free Will and Agency (4 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (3 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers) and Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (58 citations), Philosophy (98 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (100 citations), General Decision Sciences (6 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (41 citations). Thomas Kroedel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Franz Huber and L. E. Glynn. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Synthese, Noûs, Logos & Episteme and Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact