Thomas Kroedel

423 total citations
16 papers, 150 citations indexed

About

Thomas Kroedel is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy and History and Philosophy of Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Kroedel has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 150 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 11 papers in Philosophy and 7 papers in History and Philosophy of Science. Recurrent topics in Thomas Kroedel's work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (12 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers). Thomas Kroedel is often cited by papers focused on Philosophy and Theoretical Science (12 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers). Thomas Kroedel collaborates with scholars based in Germany and United Kingdom. Thomas Kroedel's co-authors include Franz Huber and L. E. Glynn and has published in prestigious journals such as Noûs, Synthese and Philosophical Studies.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Kroedel

14 papers receiving 130 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas Kroedel Germany	7	94	94	52	41	24	16	150
Jeffrey Sanford Russell United States	9	86 0.9×	98 1.0×	45 0.9×	27 0.7×	32 1.3×	19	166
Ruth Weintraub Israel	7	67 0.7×	126 1.3×	73 1.4×	39 1.0×	26 1.1×	39	189
Giuliano Torrengo Italy	9	124 1.3×	88 0.9×	62 1.2×	28 0.7×	10 0.4×	43	191
Luca Moretti United Kingdom	10	99 1.1×	159 1.7×	57 1.1×	47 1.1×	41 1.7×	43	204
David Robb United Kingdom	7	84 0.9×	133 1.4×	51 1.0×	119 2.9×	13 0.5×	33	249
Craig Bourne United Kingdom	8	197 2.1×	159 1.7×	103 2.0×	25 0.6×	22 0.9×	19	277
Jeanne Peijnenburg Netherlands	9	41 0.4×	87 0.9×	97 1.9×	18 0.4×	23 1.0×	40	175
Igal Kvart Israel	6	83 0.9×	80 0.9×	53 1.0×	15 0.4×	46 1.9×	28	170
David Lewis United States	2	161 1.7×	142 1.5×	123 2.4×	20 0.5×	32 1.3×	4	229
Boris Kment United States	6	223 2.4×	219 2.3×	123 2.4×	47 1.1×	52 2.2×	13	305

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Kroedel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Kroedel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Kroedel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Kroedel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Kroedel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Kroedel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Kroedel. The network helps show where Thomas Kroedel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Kroedel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Kroedel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Kroedel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Kroedel. Thomas Kroedel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

16 of 16 papers shown

1.

Kroedel, Thomas. (2024). How not to intervene on mental causes. Philosophical Studies. 181(10). 2479–2497.

2.

Kroedel, Thomas. (2019). Mental Causation: A Counterfactual Theory. 6 indexed citations

3.

Kroedel, Thomas. (2019). Mental Causation. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 4 indexed citations

4.

Kroedel, Thomas. (2017). A new future similarity objection. Philosophical Studies. 175(6). 1477–1493. 2 indexed citations

5.

Kroedel, Thomas. (2017). The Lottery, the Preface, and Conditions on Permissible Belief. Erkenntnis. 83(4). 741–751. 1 indexed citations

6.

Kroedel, Thomas, et al.. (2015). Grounding mental causation. Synthese. 193(6). 1909–1923. 17 indexed citations

7.

Kroedel, Thomas. (2014). A simple argument for downward causation. Synthese. 192(3). 841–858. 5 indexed citations

8.

Kroedel, Thomas. (2013). Why Epistemic Permissions Don’t Agglomerate – Another Reply to Littlejohn. Logos & Episteme. 4(4). 451–455. 5 indexed citations

9.

Kroedel, Thomas. (2013). The Permissibility Solution to the Lottery Paradox – Reply to Littlejohn. Logos & Episteme. 4(1). 103–111. 5 indexed citations

10.

Glynn, L. E. & Thomas Kroedel. (2013). Relativity, Quantum Entanglement, Counterfactuals, and Causation. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 66(1). 45–67. 9 indexed citations

11.

Kroedel, Thomas. (2013). Dualist Mental Causation and the Exclusion Problem. Noûs. 49(2). 357–375. 22 indexed citations

12.

Kroedel, Thomas. (2012). Counterfactuals and the Epistemology of Modality. Philosopher's Imprint. 12(12). 20 indexed citations

13.

Kroedel, Thomas & Franz Huber. (2012). Counterfactual Dependence and Arrow. Noûs. 47(3). 453–466. 17 indexed citations

14.

Kroedel, Thomas. (2011). The lottery paradox, epistemic justification and permissibility. Analysis. 72(1). 57–60. 16 indexed citations

15.

Kroedel, Thomas. (2010). Implicit definition and the application of logic. Philosophical Studies. 158(1). 131–148. 3 indexed citations

16.

Kroedel, Thomas. (2007). Mental causation as multiple causation. Philosophical Studies. 139(1). 125–143. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact