William Roche

407 citations
30 papers · 157 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

William Roche

27 papers receiving 134 citations

Peers

William Roche
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • History and Philosophy of Science 92
  • Philosophy 103
  • General Decision Sciences 16
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 43
  • Artificial Intelligence 64
Replace Brad Armendt with:
Brad Armendt United States
Bernhard Salow United States
Jeanne Peijnenburg Netherlands
Thomas Blanchard United States
Jeffrey Sanford Russell United States
Arif Ahmed United Kingdom
Igal Kvart Israel
Fabrizio Cariani United States
Paolo Santorio United States
Ken Akiba United States
William Roche relative to Brad Armendt United States Brad Armendt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Brad Armendt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Roche

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Roche's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Roche with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Roche more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Roche

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Roche. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Roche. The network helps show where William Roche may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside William Roche, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Roche Line = papers co-authored together William Roche links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201118
2 201317
3 201412
4 201211
5 201410
6 201310
7 20169
8 20178
9 20156
10 20096
11 20116
12 20155
13 20125
14 20195
15 20184
16 20134
17
Can A Coherentist Be An Externalist?
20063
18 20183
19
Inference to the Best Explanation and the Screening-Off Challenge
20193
20 20222

About William Roche

William Roche is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 30 papers that have together received 157 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (23 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (15 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (10 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (4 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers), Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2 papers) and Free Will and Agency (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (92 citations), Philosophy (103 citations), General Decision Sciences (16 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (43 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (64 citations). William Roche has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Tomoji Shogenji and Elliott Sober. Their work appears in journals such as Erkenntnis, Philosophy of Science, Synthese, European Journal for Philosophy of Science and The Philosophical Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact