Ioannis Votsis

469 total citations
22 papers, 155 citations indexed

About

Ioannis Votsis is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ioannis Votsis has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 155 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in History and Philosophy of Science, 7 papers in Philosophy and 6 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Ioannis Votsis's work include Philosophy and History of Science (15 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers). Ioannis Votsis is often cited by papers focused on Philosophy and History of Science (15 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers). Ioannis Votsis collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Mexico. Ioannis Votsis's co-authors include Roman Frigg, Gerhard Schurz, Uskali Mäki, Stéphanie Ruphy, Katherine Hawley, Jon Williamson, Robert J. O’Hara and Lesley B. Cormack and has published in prestigious journals such as Philosophy of Science, Synthese and Philosophical Studies.

In The Last Decade

Ioannis Votsis

20 papers receiving 136 citations

Peers

Ioannis Votsis
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • History and Philosophy of Science 118
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 33
  • Philosophy 32
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 22
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 19
Mark Povich United States
Sorin Bangu Norway
Samuel Schindler Denmark
Ronald Laymon United States
Carlo Cellucci Italy
James Nguyen United Kingdom
Gereon Wolters Germany
Brigitte Falkenburg Germany
Antony Eagle Australia
Stéphanie Ruphy France
Mark Povich United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Ioannis Votsis
Ioannis Votsis · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Ioannis Votsis
Ioannis Votsis · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Ioannis Votsis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ioannis Votsis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ioannis Votsis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ioannis Votsis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ioannis Votsis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ioannis Votsis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ioannis Votsis. The network helps show where Ioannis Votsis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ioannis Votsis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ioannis Votsis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ioannis Votsis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ioannis Votsis. Ioannis Votsis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 2
4 7
5 12
6
Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science
7
7 6
8 4
9 1
10 56
11 11
12 11
13
How not to be a Realist or why we Ought to Make it Safe for Closet Structural Realists to Come out.
2
14 1
15 1
16 3
17 2
18 3
19 8
20 12

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026