Ioannis Votsis
- History and Philosophy of Science top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Philosophy top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- Roman FriggGerhard SchurzUskali MäkiStéphanie RuphyKatherine HawleyJon WilliamsonRobert J. O’HaraLesley B. Cormack
- Topics
- Philosophy and History of Science (15 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomMexico
In The Last Decade
Ioannis Votsis
20 papers receiving 136 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- History and Philosophy of Science 118
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 33
- Philosophy 32
- Cognitive Neuroscience 22
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 19
Countries citing papers authored by Ioannis Votsis
This map shows the geographic impact of Ioannis Votsis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ioannis Votsis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ioannis Votsis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ioannis Votsis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ioannis Votsis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ioannis Votsis. The network helps show where Ioannis Votsis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ioannis Votsis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ioannis Votsis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ioannis Votsis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ioannis Votsis. Ioannis Votsis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science | 7 |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 56 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | How not to be a Realist or why we Ought to Make it Safe for Closet Structural Realists to Come out. | 2 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About Ioannis Votsis
Ioannis Votsis is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 155 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (15 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (118 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (4 citations) and Philosophy (32 citations). Ioannis Votsis has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Roman Frigg, Gerhard Schurz, Uskali Mäki, Stéphanie Ruphy, Katherine Hawley, Jon Williamson, Robert J. O’Hara and Lesley B. Cormack. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, Synthese and Philosophical Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.