Michael T. Stuart
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 17
- Philosophy, Science, and History 2
- Philosophy 12
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 12
- Co-authors
- Markus Kneer (2 shared papers)Édouard Machery (1 shared paper)David Colaço (1 shared paper)Nancy J. Nersessian (1 shared paper)Daniel A. Wilkenfeld (1 shared paper)Kourken Michaelian (1 shared paper)Christopher Jude McCarroll (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Synthese (3 papers)Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (2 papers)Perspectives on Science (2 papers)Philosophy of Science (2 papers)European Journal for Philosophy of Science (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandUnited KingdomTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Michael T. Stuart
23 papers receiving 206 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- History and Philosophy of Science 109
- General Psychology 8
- Philosophy 68
- Cognitive Neuroscience 77
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 47
Countries citing papers authored by Michael T. Stuart
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael T. Stuart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael T. Stuart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael T. Stuart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael T. Stuart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael T. Stuart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael T. Stuart. The network helps show where Michael T. Stuart may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Michael T. Stuart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 26 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 24 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2025 | 2 |
About Michael T. Stuart
Michael T. Stuart is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 213 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (17 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (12 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers), Science and Climate Studies (2 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (2 papers) and Quantum Mechanics and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (109 citations), General Psychology (8 citations), Philosophy (68 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (77 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (47 citations). Michael T. Stuart has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United Kingdom and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Markus Kneer, Édouard Machery, David Colaço, Nancy J. Nersessian, Daniel A. Wilkenfeld, Kourken Michaelian and Christopher Jude McCarroll. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Perspectives on Science, Philosophy of Science and European Journal for Philosophy of Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.