Dylan Murray

575 citations
6 papers · 173 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

    • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 5
    • Free Will and Agency 3
    • Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations 1
    • Emotions and Moral Behavior 2

Dylan Murray

6 papers receiving 164 citations

Peers

Dylan Murray
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 137
  • General Decision Sciences 11
  • Philosophy 60
  • Information Systems and Management 15
  • Social Psychology 36
Replace Mark Phelan with:
Mark Phelan United States
Tamler Sommers United States
Santiago Arango‐Muñoz Colombia
Neil Sinhababu Singapore
Trevor Kvaran United States
Nick Byrd United States
Peter A. Graham United States
Stacey Swain United States
Joachim Horvath Germany
Renatas Berniûnas Lithuania
Dylan Murray relative to Mark Phelan United States Mark Phelan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Mark Phelan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dylan Murray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dylan Murray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dylan Murray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dylan Murray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dylan Murray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dylan Murray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dylan Murray. The network helps show where Dylan Murray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Dylan Murray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dylan Murray Line = papers co-authored together Dylan Murray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown

About Dylan Murray

Dylan Murray is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 6 papers that have together received 173 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), Free Will and Agency (3 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (2 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (1 paper), Psychology of Social Influence (1 paper), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (137 citations), General Decision Sciences (11 citations), Philosophy (60 citations), Information Systems and Management (15 citations) and Social Psychology (36 citations). Dylan Murray has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Eddy Nahmias, Tania Lombrozo, Justin Sytsma, Jonathan Livengood, Fiery Cushman, Joshua D. Greene, Shauna Gordon-McKeon and Thomas Blanchard. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Mind & Language and Cognitive Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact