Thomas Balle

2.5k citations
91 papers · 2.0k indexed · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Balle

89 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Thomas Balle
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 417
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 345
  • Molecular Biology 1.3k
  • Pharmacology 294
  • Organic Chemistry 416
Replace Hassan Pajouhesh with:
Hassan Pajouhesh United States
María Novella Romanelli Italy
Maria Frosini Italy
Howard B. Broughton United States
Newton G. Castro Brazil
Michael B. Bolger United States
Ae Nim Pae South Korea
Marián Castro Spain
Ki Duk Park South Korea
Michela Buccioni Italy
Thomas Balle relative to Hassan Pajouhesh United States Hassan Pajouhesh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Hassan Pajouhesh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Balle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Balle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Balle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Balle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Balle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Balle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Balle. The network helps show where Thomas Balle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Balle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Balle Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Balle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20231
2 20232
3 202319
4 202114
5 201911
6 20185
7 201513
8
Acetylcholine-binding protein engineered to mimic the alpha4- alpha 4 binding pocket in alpha 4beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors reveals interface specific interactions important for binding and activity
20151
9 201436
10 201337
11 201217
12 201211
13 20127
14 201138
15 201143
16 201011
17 200946
18 200718
19 200414
20 200315

About Thomas Balle

Thomas Balle is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Physiology, having authored 91 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (52 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (40 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (21 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (17 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (15 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (12 papers), Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (11 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (417 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (345 citations), Molecular Biology (1.3k citations), Pharmacology (294 citations) and Organic Chemistry (416 citations). Thomas Balle has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Australia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Paolo Tosco, Philip K. Ahring, J.S. Kastrup, Michael Gajhede, Kasper Harpsøe, Anders A. Jensen, Dan Peters, Tommy Liljefors, Fereshteh Shiri and Mary Chebib. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling, Molecular Pharmacology and Molecules.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026