Mary Chebib
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Graham A.R. JohnstonJane R. HanrahanNathan L. AbsalomKenneth N. MewettHan Chow ChuaRujee K. DukeNasiara KarimIain S. McGregor
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (88 papers)Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (79 papers)Ion channel regulation and function (25 papers)
- Cited by
- Cellular and Molecular NeuroscienceBiological PsychiatryComplementary and alternative medicine
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Biological ChemistryNature Communications
- Partner nations
- AustraliaDenmarkUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mary Chebib
146 papers receiving 4.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
- Molecular Biology 2.4k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 2.2k
- Pharmacology 745
- Organic Chemistry 653
- Complementary and alternative medicine 574
Countries citing papers authored by Mary Chebib
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Chebib's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Chebib with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Chebib more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Chebib
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Chebib. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Chebib. The network helps show where Mary Chebib may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Chebib
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Chebib. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Chebib based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Chebib. Mary Chebib is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 37 | |
| 7 | 32 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 62 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 96 | |
| 15 | 33 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 73 | |
| 18 | 52 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About Mary Chebib
Mary Chebib is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 146 papers that have together received 5.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (88 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (79 papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (25 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.2k citations), Biological Psychiatry (182 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (574 citations). Mary Chebib has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Denmark and United States. Frequent co-authors include Graham A.R. Johnston, Jane R. Hanrahan, Nathan L. Absalom, Kenneth N. Mewett, Han Chow Chua, Rujee K. Duke, Nasiara Karim, Iain S. McGregor, Jonathon C. Arnold and Philip K. Ahring. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.