Martin Mahner

1.7k total citations
16 papers, 711 citations indexed

About

Martin Mahner is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Martin Mahner has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 711 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in History and Philosophy of Science, 2 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 2 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Martin Mahner's work include Philosophy and History of Science (8 papers), Evolution and Science Education (5 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers). Martin Mahner is often cited by papers focused on Philosophy and History of Science (8 papers), Evolution and Science Education (5 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers). Martin Mahner collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Martin Mahner's co-authors include Christian Fischer and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Theoretical Biology, Philosophy of Science and Science & Education.

In The Last Decade

Martin Mahner

14 papers receiving 634 citations

Peers

Martin Mahner

HPS

MB

GENET

EEBS

SPS

Ingo Brigandt Canada

Richard W. Burkhardt United States

Ron Amundson United States

Thomas A. C. Reydon Germany

Mary P. Winsor Canada

Dorion Sagan United States

Garland E. Allen United States

Jean Gayon France

E. Mayr United States

David Depew United States

Ingo Brigandt Canada

Martin Mahner

285 ×1.7

HPS

190 ×1.3

MB

91 ×0.7

GENET

56 ×0.5

EEBS

116 ×1.2

SPS

Citations per year, relative to Martin Mahner Martin Mahner (= 1×) peers Ingo Brigandt

Countries citing papers authored by Martin Mahner

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Martin Mahner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martin Mahner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martin Mahner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Martin Mahner

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martin Mahner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martin Mahner. The network helps show where Martin Mahner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Martin Mahner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Martin Mahner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Martin Mahner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Martin Mahner. Martin Mahner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

16 of 16 papers shown

1.

Mahner, Martin. (2021). Mario Bunge (1919–2020): Conjoining Philosophy of Science and Scientific Philosophy. Journal for General Philosophy of Science. 52(1). 3–23. 1 indexed citations

2.

Mahner, Martin. (2011). The Role of Metaphysical Naturalism in Science. Science & Education. 21(10). 1437–1459. 8 indexed citations

3.

Mahner, Martin. (2004). Über die Natur der Dinge.

4.

Mahner, Martin, et al.. (2002). How Would You Know if You Synthesized a Thinking Thing?. Minds and Machines. 12(1). 61–86. 2 indexed citations

5.

Mahner, Martin, et al.. (2001). Function and Functionalism: A Synthetic Perspective. Philosophy of Science. 68(1). 75–94. 45 indexed citations

6.

Mahner, Martin, et al.. (2001). Scientific Realism: Selected Essays of Mario Bunge. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 27 indexed citations

7.

Mahner, Martin. (2001). Genetics and Reductionism: Unveiling Mechanisms Without Metaphysics?. Biology & Philosophy. 16(3). 395–403.

8.

Fischer, Christian, et al.. (2000). The rhabdom structure in the ommatidia of the Heteroptera (Insecta), and its phylogenetic significance. Zoomorphology. 120(1). 1–13. 26 indexed citations

9.

Mahner, Martin, et al.. (2000). Philosophische Grundlagen der Biologie. 19 indexed citations

10.

Mahner, Martin. (1998). Operationalist Fallacies in Biology. Science & Education. 7(4). 403–421. 3 indexed citations

11.

Mahner, Martin, et al.. (1997). What Exactly Are Genomes, Genotypes and Phenotypes? And What About Phenomes?. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 186(1). 55–63. 88 indexed citations

12.

Mahner, Martin, et al.. (1997). Foundations of Biophilosophy. 274 indexed citations

13.

Mahner, Martin, et al.. (1996). Is religious education compatible with science education?. Science & Education. 5(2). 101–123. 85 indexed citations

14.

Mahner, Martin, et al.. (1996). The incompatibility of science and religion sustained: A reply to our critics. Science & Education. 5(2). 189–199. 12 indexed citations

15.

Mahner, Martin. (1993). What is a species?. Journal for General Philosophy of Science. 24(1). 103–126. 72 indexed citations

16.

Mahner, Martin. (1993). Systema Cryptoceratorum Phylogeneticum - (Insecta, Heteroptera). 49 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact