Sandra D. Mitchell

3.1k citations
37 papers · 1.5k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Sandra D. Mitchell

37 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Sandra D. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • History and Philosophy of Science 570
  • General Psychology 16
  • Philosophy 135
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 150
  • Genetics 283
Replace Richard M. Burian with:
Richard M. Burian United States
Jane Maienschein United States
Robert N. Brandon United States
Kalevi Kull Estonia
Stanley N. Salthe United States
Marion J. Lamb United Kingdom
Nicholas Shea United Kingdom
Samir Okasha United Kingdom
Peter J. Bowler United Kingdom
Marc Ereshefsky Canada
Sandra D. Mitchell relative to Richard M. Burian United States Richard M. Burian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Richard M. Burian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra D. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra D. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra D. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra D. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra D. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra D. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra D. Mitchell. The network helps show where Sandra D. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sandra D. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sandra D. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Sandra D. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009209
2 2003208
3 2002148
4 2000131
5 1998115
6 199892
7 199768
8 198764
9 199044
10 200639
11 199336
12 201034
13 199228
14 199327
15 200924
16 199521
17 201521
18 200220
19 201419
20 200818

About Sandra D. Mitchell

Sandra D. Mitchell is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (16 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (9 papers), Plant and animal studies (4 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (4 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (3 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (3 papers) and Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (570 citations), General Psychology (16 citations), Philosophy (135 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (150 citations) and Genetics (283 citations). Sandra D. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Robert E. Page, Peter J. Richerson, Sabine Maasen, Peter Weingart, Lee Freese, Michael Dietrich, Angela M. Gronenborn, John Earman, Clark Glymour and Gerd Gigerenzer. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, Biology & Philosophy, Erkenntnis, Synthese and The American Naturalist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact