Thom Scott‐Phillips
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Cultural Studies top 1%
- Social Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Christophe HeintzStefaan BlanckeHugo MercierFabrice ClémentKenny SmithAlberto AcerbiMathieu CharbonneauHelena Miton
- Topics
- Language and cultural evolution (13 papers)Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (7 papers)Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (5 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesBehavioral and Brain Sciences
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustriaSpain
In The Last Decade
Thom Scott‐Phillips
22 papers receiving 271 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Sociology and Political Science 121
- Cultural Studies 101
- Social Psychology 83
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 69
- Cognitive Neuroscience 57
Countries citing papers authored by Thom Scott‐Phillips
This map shows the geographic impact of Thom Scott‐Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thom Scott‐Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thom Scott‐Phillips more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thom Scott‐Phillips
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thom Scott‐Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thom Scott‐Phillips. The network helps show where Thom Scott‐Phillips may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thom Scott‐Phillips
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thom Scott‐Phillips. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thom Scott‐Phillips based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thom Scott‐Phillips. Thom Scott‐Phillips is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 32 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | Codes for simulations described in 'Culture without copying or selection' | 2 |
| 16 | 61 | |
| 17 | The dot perspective task revisited: Evidence for directional effects. | 1 |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 37 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Thom Scott‐Phillips
Thom Scott‐Phillips is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Archeology and Developmental Biology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 280 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language and cultural evolution (13 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (7 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (101 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (69 citations) and Language and Linguistics (45 citations). Thom Scott‐Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Austria and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Christophe Heintz, Stefaan Blancke, Hugo Mercier, Fabrice Clément, Kenny Smith, Alberto Acerbi, Mathieu Charbonneau, Helena Miton, Kate McCallum and Jamshid J. Tehrani. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.