Theo Blick

1.2k total citations
83 papers, 771 citations indexed

About

Theo Blick is a scholar working on Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Theo Blick has authored 83 papers receiving a total of 771 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 53 papers in Genetics, 44 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 19 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in Theo Blick's work include Spider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies (50 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (21 papers) and Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (17 papers). Theo Blick is often cited by papers focused on Spider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies (50 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (21 papers) and Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (17 papers). Theo Blick collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Theo Blick's co-authors include Christian Kropf, Oliver‐D. Finch, Andreas Schuldt, Wolfgang Nentwig, Wolfgang Dorow, Henryk Luka, Lukas Pfiffner, Martin M. Goßner, Wolfgang Nentwig and Peter Sacher and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Biological Conservation and Forest Ecology and Management.

In The Last Decade

Theo Blick

77 papers receiving 694 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Theo Blick Germany 15 398 377 228 171 155 83 771
George Gibbs New Zealand 16 209 0.5× 385 1.0× 147 0.6× 213 1.2× 230 1.5× 29 682
Augusto Vigna Taglianti Italy 15 303 0.8× 603 1.6× 253 1.1× 156 0.9× 329 2.1× 72 917
Paul A. Opler United States 16 414 1.0× 676 1.8× 187 0.8× 351 2.1× 174 1.1× 43 910
Chris A. M. Reid Australia 14 261 0.7× 625 1.7× 323 1.4× 249 1.5× 389 2.5× 80 968
Amy E. Arnett United States 14 330 0.8× 500 1.3× 340 1.5× 215 1.3× 288 1.9× 20 953
José Wellington de Morais Brazil 17 247 0.6× 419 1.1× 87 0.4× 208 1.2× 107 0.7× 75 676
J. L. Bossart United States 13 444 1.1× 376 1.0× 229 1.0× 207 1.2× 266 1.7× 24 853
Achille Casale Italy 12 183 0.5× 442 1.2× 341 1.5× 267 1.6× 337 2.2× 63 849
Tom A. Weir Australia 14 130 0.3× 427 1.1× 203 0.9× 202 1.2× 190 1.2× 39 669
Paola D’Alessandro Italy 18 276 0.7× 427 1.1× 124 0.5× 160 0.9× 372 2.4× 75 827

Countries citing papers authored by Theo Blick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Theo Blick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Theo Blick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theo Blick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Theo Blick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Theo Blick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Theo Blick. The network helps show where Theo Blick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Theo Blick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Theo Blick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Theo Blick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Theo Blick. Theo Blick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Blick, Theo, et al.. (2020). The list of forest affinities for animals in Central Europe – A valuable resource for ecological analysis and monitoring in forest animal communities?. Forest Ecology and Management. 479. 118542–118542. 10 indexed citations
2.
Blick, Theo, et al.. (2019). Spiders of dry grasslands in and around Berlin - diversity, distribution and endangerment.. Arachnologische Mitteilungen Arachnology Letters. 52–61. 1 indexed citations
3.
Kropf, Christian, Theo Blick, Antônio D. Brescovit, et al.. (2019). How not to delimit taxa: a critique on a recently proposed “pragmatic classification” of jumping spiders (Arthropoda: Arachnida: Araneae: Salticidae). Zootaxa. 4545(3). 444–446. 9 indexed citations
4.
Goßner, Martin M., Nadja K. Simons, Theo Blick, et al.. (2015). A summary of eight traits of Coleoptera, Hemiptera, Orthoptera and Araneae, occurring in grasslands in Germany. Scientific Data. 2(1). 150013–150013. 46 indexed citations
5.
Nentwig, Wolfgang, et al.. (2011). Araneae: Spinnen Europas - Spiders of Europe. Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern). 34 indexed citations
6.
Dorow, Wolfgang, Theo Blick, & Jens‐Peter Kopelke. (2010). Zoological research in Strict Forest Reserves in Hesse (Germany) - exemplary results and prospects.. 81(2). 61–68. 2 indexed citations
7.
Schardt, M., et al.. (2008). Ecological comparison of spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) from short rotation coppice plots and from arable fields.. 16. 131–135. 2 indexed citations
8.
Luka, Henryk, et al.. (2006). Säume wirken sich positiv auf die Gliedertiere aus. Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture). 2 indexed citations
9.
Blick, Theo. (2005). Dmitri V. Logunov & David Penney (eds.) (2004): European Arachnology 2003.. Arachnologische Mitteilungen Arachnology Letters. 29. 59–60.
10.
Ramiréz, Martín J., et al.. (2004). NOTES ON THE SPIDER FAMILY AGELENIDAE IN SOUTHERN SOUTH AMERICA (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE). Revista de aracnología. 179–182. 5 indexed citations
12.
Blick, Theo. (2002). Logunov, D.V. & Y.M. Marusik (2000): Catalogue of the jumping spiders of northern Asia (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae). Arachnologische Mitteilungen Arachnology Letters. 23. 60–61. 10 indexed citations
13.
Luka, Henryk, Michael W. Lutz, Theo Blick, & Lukas Pfiffner. (2001). Einfluss von eingesäten Wildblumenstreifen auf die epigäischen Lautkäferrind Spinnen (Carabidaeund Araneae) in der intensiv genutzten Agrarlandschaft "Grosses Moos",Schweiz. Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture). 3 indexed citations
14.
Blick, Theo, Lukas Pfiffner, & Henryk Luka. (2000). Ground-living spiders on arable land in north-western Switzerland with a Central European comparison (Arachnida: Araneae).. 12. 267–276. 2 indexed citations
15.
Bosmans, Robert & Theo Blick. (1999). Contribution to the knowledge of the genus Micaria in the West-palaearctic region, with description of the new genus Arboricaria and three new species (Araneae Gnaphosidae). Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution). 78(2). 443–476. 5 indexed citations
16.
Blick, Theo & Csaba Szinetár. (1996). Glyphesis conicusist ein jüngeres Synonym vonGlyphesis taoplesius(Araneae: Linyphiidae). Arachnologische Mitteilungen Arachnology Letters. 11. 39–42. 2 indexed citations
18.
Blick, Theo & Hendrik Segers. (1993). Probleme beiPhilodromus-Arten in Mitteleuropa:P. aureolus/praedatusundP. rufus/albidus(Araneae: Philodromidae). Arachnologische Mitteilungen Arachnology Letters. 6. 44–47. 1 indexed citations
19.
Blick, Theo. (1991). Bathyphantes eumenis, neu für Deutschland und Frankreich, sowieLepthyphantes notabilisaus Blockhalden (Araneae: Linyphiidae). Arachnologische Mitteilungen Arachnology Letters. 2. 31–32. 4 indexed citations
20.
Blick, Theo, et al.. (1991). Kommentierte Artenliste der Spinnen Bayerns (Araneae). Arachnologische Mitteilungen Arachnology Letters. 1. 27–80. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026