Amy E. Arnett

1.1k citations
20 papers · 953 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Amy E. Arnett

20 papers receiving 888 citations

Peers

Amy E. Arnett
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Ecological Modeling 128
  • Insect Science 340
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 500
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 215
  • Genetics 330
Replace Chris A. M. Reid with:
Chris A. M. Reid Australia
José Alberto Quartau Portugal
M. W. Mansell South Africa
Paul D. Krushelnycky United States
Rebecca J. Rundell United States
Augusto Vigna Taglianti Italy
J. L. Bossart United States
Yann Hénaut Mexico
Theo Blick Germany
Pierre Paquin United States
Amy E. Arnett relative to Chris A. M. Reid Australia Chris A. M. Reid's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Chris A. M. Reid · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amy E. Arnett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy E. Arnett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy E. Arnett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy E. Arnett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy E. Arnett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy E. Arnett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy E. Arnett. The network helps show where Amy E. Arnett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amy E. Arnett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amy E. Arnett Line = papers co-authored together Amy E. Arnett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2000151
2 1999127
3 200394
4 201065
5 200365
6 199965
7 199961
8 200256
9 200553
10 201548
11 200145
12 200544
13
Predicting Non-Target Ecological Effects of Biological Control Agents: Evidence from Rhinocyllus conicus
200024
14 201914
15 201213
16 201110
17
Connecting Mathematics and Science: A Learning Community that Helps Math-Phobic Students.
20098
18 20155
19 19973
20 20242

About Amy E. Arnett

Amy E. Arnett is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science, Ecology and Plant Science, having authored 20 papers that have together received 953 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (8 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (8 papers), Plant and animal studies (7 papers), Biological Control of Invasive Species (6 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (4 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (3 papers), Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions (3 papers) and Physiological and biochemical adaptations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (128 citations), Insect Science (340 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (500 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (215 citations) and Genetics (330 citations). Amy E. Arnett has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas J. Gotelli, Svaťa M. Louda, Tatyana A. Rand, Francis Russell, Dušan Devetak, Katriona Shea, Tone Novak, Franc Janžekovič, Matjaž Perc and A. S. McClay. Their work appears in journals such as Evolution, The American Naturalist, Biological Control, Journal of Insect Behavior and Journal of Biogeography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact