Peter Bliss

1.3k citations
29 papers · 987 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Bliss

28 papers receiving 940 citations

Peers

Peter Bliss
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 92
  • Biochemistry 116
  • Plant Science 429
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 146
  • Genetics 174
Replace Camilla Pandolfi with:
Camilla Pandolfi Italy
Anne‐Marja Nerg Finland
María-Dolores Rey Spain
Binghua Liu China
Μαρία Κωνσταντοπούλου Greece
Jinping Zhang China
A. Minnocci Italy
Natalia Correa‐Aragunde Argentina
Pauline Lemonnier United States
B J Harrison United Kingdom
Peter Bliss relative to Camilla Pandolfi Italy Camilla Pandolfi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.2×
Camilla Pandolfi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Bliss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Bliss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Bliss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Bliss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Bliss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Bliss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Bliss. The network helps show where Peter Bliss may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Bliss, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Bliss Line = papers co-authored together Peter Bliss links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012284
2 2006188
3 2008133
4 200561
5 199560
6 200642
7 199541
8 199527
9 200520
10 200819
11 201517
12 199116
13
The role of molehills and grasses for filial nest founding in the wood ant Formica exsecta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
200613
14 200813
15 19859
16 20117
17 20087
18 19945
19 20095
20 19965

About Peter Bliss

Peter Bliss is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Paleontology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Pollution, having authored 29 papers that have together received 987 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (9 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (7 papers), Spider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies (6 papers), Plant and animal studies (4 papers), Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy (4 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers), Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (3 papers) and Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (92 citations), Biochemistry (116 citations), Plant Science (429 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (146 citations) and Genetics (174 citations). Peter Bliss has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark G. Taylor, Denise M. Tieman, Harry J. Klee, Robin F. A. Moritz, Kaiyun Jiang, Matias Kirst, Eric A. Schmelz, Sandrine Mathieu, Zhangjun Fei and Hua Li. Their work appears in journals such as Water Science & Technology, Journal of Arachnology, Journal of Experimental Botany, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association and Current Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact