Biodiversity and Conservation

5.6k papers and 188.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.6k papers published in Biodiversity and Conservation in the last decades have received a total of 188.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Biodiversity and Conservation usually cover Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.5k papers), Ecology (2.5k papers) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.8k papers) specifically the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2.2k papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (1.3k papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (1.3k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biodiversity and Conservation are Jari Niemelä, Ralph Mac Nally, Michael J. Samways, Patricia J. Folgarait, Jon Fjeldså, John S. Gray, Kevin J. Gaston, Ralph Mac Nally, Alan Hamilton and Nigel E. Stork.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Biodiversity and Conservation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biodiversity and Conservation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biodiversity and Conservation.

Countries where authors publish in Biodiversity and Conservation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biodiversity and Conservation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biodiversity and Conservation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biodiversity and Conservation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025