Tessa Magnée
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Epidemiology
- Clinical Psychology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Peter VerhaakDerek de BeursLiselotte GootjesNiek J. de WitJan W. Van StrienGera E. NagelhoutJozien M. BensingD.H. de Bakker
- Topics
- Mental Health Treatment and Access (11 papers)Psychiatric care and mental health services (6 papers)Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Tessa Magnée
31 papers receiving 245 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- General Health Professions 107
- Social Psychology 59
- Epidemiology 47
- Clinical Psychology 46
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 36
Countries citing papers authored by Tessa Magnée
This map shows the geographic impact of Tessa Magnée's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tessa Magnée with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tessa Magnée more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tessa Magnée
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tessa Magnée. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tessa Magnée. The network helps show where Tessa Magnée may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tessa Magnée
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tessa Magnée. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tessa Magnée based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tessa Magnée. Tessa Magnée is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | [Developments in mental health care in Dutch general practices: an overview of recent studies]. | 2 |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | [Do mental health nurses take over care from general practitioners?] | 1 |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | Verlicht de POH-GGZ de werkdruk van de huisarts? | 3 |
| 18 | 39 | |
| 19 | Consulten bij de huisarts en de POH-GGZ in verband met psychosociale problematiek. Een analyse van NIVEL Zorgregistraties gegevens van 2010-2014. | 1 |
| 20 | 36 |
About Tessa Magnée
Tessa Magnée is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, General Health Professions and Health, having authored 39 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (11 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (6 papers) and Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (107 citations), Social Psychology (59 citations) and Applied Psychology (14 citations). Tessa Magnée has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Verhaak, Derek de Beurs, Liselotte Gootjes, Niek J. de Wit, Jan W. Van Strien, Gera E. Nagelhout, Jozien M. Bensing, D.H. de Bakker, Renée M.F. Ebisch and Gert‐Jan Meerkerk. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Vaccine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.