Gera E. Nagelhout

119 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Gera E. Nagelhout
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Applied Psychology 529
  • Physiology 1.5k
  • Speech and Hearing 308
  • Health 327
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 635
Replace Anne Marie MacKintosh with:
Anne Marie MacKintosh United Kingdom
Pebbles Fagan United States
Marc C. Willemsen Netherlands
Cheryl Healton United States
Michelle Scollo Australia
Joseph G. L. Lee United States
Jessica M. Rath United States
R. Borland Australia
Jennifer Cantrell United States
Hai‐Yen Sung United States
Gera E. Nagelhout relative to Anne Marie MacKintosh United Kingdom Anne Marie MacKintosh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Anne Marie MacKintosh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gera E. Nagelhout

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gera E. Nagelhout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gera E. Nagelhout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gera E. Nagelhout more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gera E. Nagelhout

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gera E. Nagelhout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gera E. Nagelhout. The network helps show where Gera E. Nagelhout may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gera E. Nagelhout, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gera E. Nagelhout Line = papers co-authored together Gera E. Nagelhout links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 130 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012120
2 2012110
3 2014105
4 2017104
5 201588
6 201685
7 201771
8 201161
9 201255
10 201054
11 201453
12 201051
13 202050
14 201849
15 201348
16 202147
17 201246
18 201145
19 201545
20 201143

About Gera E. Nagelhout

Gera E. Nagelhout is a scholar working on Physiology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Applied Psychology and Speech and Hearing, having authored 130 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (84 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (33 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (31 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (18 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (18 papers), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (12 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (12 papers) and Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (529 citations), Physiology (1.5k citations), Speech and Hearing (308 citations), Health (327 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (635 citations). Gera E. Nagelhout has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marc C. Willemsen, Hein de Vries, Bas van den Putte, Geoffrey T. Fong, Romain Guignard, Ute Mons, Mary E. Thompson, Floor A van den Brand, James F. Thrasher and Ron Borland. Their work appears in journals such as Nicotine & Tobacco Research, BMC Public Health, Tobacco Control, European Journal of Public Health and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact