Derek de Beurs

3.6k citations
90 papers · 2.2k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Derek de Beurs

84 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Derek de Beurs
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Applied Psychology 356
  • Clinical Psychology 1.3k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 656
  • Biological Psychiatry 113
  • Social Psychology 626
Replace Anneke van Schaik with:
Anneke van Schaik Netherlands
Sarah J. Kertz United States
Andrew M. Busch United States
Raphael D. Rose United States
Thomas Forkmann Germany
Patricia Gracia‐García Spain
Georgina Cox Australia
Sanjay Rao Canada
Michele D. Levine United States
John F. Dickerson United States
Derek de Beurs relative to Anneke van Schaik Netherlands Anneke van Schaik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Anneke van Schaik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Derek de Beurs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Derek de Beurs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Derek de Beurs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Derek de Beurs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Derek de Beurs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Derek de Beurs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Derek de Beurs. The network helps show where Derek de Beurs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Derek de Beurs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Derek de Beurs Line = papers co-authored together Derek de Beurs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020160
2 2016142
3 2021117
4 2012115
5 2016110
6 201999
7 201887
8 201766
9 202157
10 201455
11 201554
12 201952
13 200952
14 202049
15 201444
16 201744
17 201641
18 201840
19 201839
20 201536

About Derek de Beurs

Derek de Beurs is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Health Professions and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 90 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (43 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (35 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (23 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (13 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (11 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (10 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (356 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.3k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (656 citations), Biological Psychiatry (113 citations) and Social Psychology (626 citations). Derek de Beurs has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include A.J.F.M. Kerkhof, Rory C. O’Connor, Pim Cuijpers, Jos de Keijser, Marieke H. de Groot, Heleen Riper, Filip Smit, Sanne P. A. Rasing, Daan H. M. Creemers and Rutger C. M. E. Engels. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Affective Disorders, BMJ Open, Internet Interventions, Frontiers in Psychiatry and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact