Gill Pinner

515 total citations
8 papers, 288 citations indexed

About

Gill Pinner is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Gill Pinner has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 288 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 4 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 2 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Gill Pinner's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers). Gill Pinner is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers). Gill Pinner collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Belgium. Gill Pinner's co-authors include Walter Pierre Bouman, Mohsen Tavakol, Sarah J. Wilson, Fernando Fernández‐Aranda, Ellen Marshall, Jon Arcelus, Laurence Claes, Susana Jiménez‐Múrcia and Gemma L. Witcomb and has published in prestigious journals such as BMJ Open, The Journal of Sexual Medicine and International Psychogeriatrics.

In The Last Decade

Gill Pinner

8 papers receiving 269 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Gill Pinner United Kingdom	8	134	124	111	48	46	8	288
Farah Farahati United States	4	97 0.7×	58 0.5×	72 0.6×	98 2.0×	69 1.5×	6	279
Doug McConnell United Kingdom	10	49 0.4×	89 0.7×	38 0.3×	79 1.6×	38 0.8×	25	327
D. Hollander United Kingdom	7	101 0.8×	64 0.5×	29 0.3×	74 1.5×	16 0.3×	69	277
Julia Haberstroh Germany	11	138 1.0×	217 1.8×	102 0.9×	134 2.8×	49 1.1×	59	359
Ellen Tullo United Kingdom	10	92 0.7×	119 1.0×	75 0.7×	39 0.8×	33 0.7×	28	287
Rachel Daly United Kingdom	4	107 0.8×	72 0.6×	48 0.4×	177 3.7×	26 0.6×	7	285
Çlare Oakley United Kingdom	9	101 0.8×	55 0.4×	26 0.2×	109 2.3×	44 1.0×	20	226
Burcu Akpınar Söylemez Türkiye	10	114 0.9×	88 0.7×	40 0.4×	109 2.3×	25 0.5×	43	300
Jason Hancock United Kingdom	6	63 0.5×	94 0.8×	144 1.3×	38 0.8×	26 0.6×	13	259
Bill Fulford United Kingdom	10	52 0.4×	122 1.0×	48 0.4×	95 2.0×	14 0.3×	29	248

Countries citing papers authored by Gill Pinner

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gill Pinner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gill Pinner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gill Pinner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gill Pinner

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gill Pinner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gill Pinner. The network helps show where Gill Pinner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gill Pinner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gill Pinner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gill Pinner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gill Pinner. Gill Pinner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Tavakol, Mohsen & Gill Pinner. (2019). Using the Many-Facet Rasch Model to analyse and evaluate the quality of objective structured clinical examination: a non-experimental cross-sectional design. BMJ Open. 9(9). e029208–e029208. 15 indexed citations

2.

Bouman, Walter Pierre, Laurence Claes, Ellen Marshall, et al.. (2016). Sociodemographic Variables, Clinical Features, and the Role of Preassessment Cross-Sex Hormones in Older Trans People. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 13(4). 711–719. 38 indexed citations

3.

Wilson, Sarah J. & Gill Pinner. (2013). Driving and dementia: a clinician's guide. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment. 19(2). 89–96. 13 indexed citations

4.

Pinner, Gill & Walter Pierre Bouman. (2003). Attitudes of Patients With Mild Dementia and Their Carers Towards Disclosure of the Diagnosis. International Psychogeriatrics. 15(3). 279–288. 83 indexed citations

5.

Pinner, Gill & Walter Pierre Bouman. (2003). What should we tell people about dementia?. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment. 9(5). 335–341. 16 indexed citations

6.

Pinner, Gill & Walter Pierre Bouman. (2002). To Tell or Not to Tell: On Disclosing the Diagnosis of Dementia. International Psychogeriatrics. 14(2). 127–137. 46 indexed citations

7.

Bouman, Walter Pierre & Gill Pinner. (2002). Use of atypical antipsychotic drugs in old age psychiatry. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment. 8(1). 49–58. 15 indexed citations

8.

Bouman, Walter Pierre, et al.. (2000). On Telling the Truth in Alzheimer's Disease: A Pilot Study of Current Practice and Attitudes. International Psychogeriatrics. 12(2). 221–229. 62 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact