Tania Scartabelli
- Developmental Neuroscience top 10%
- Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research 3
- Neurology top 10%
- Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms 3
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 9
-
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments 3
-
- Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research 3
-
- Ocular Infections and Treatments 2
-
- Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection 2
-
- Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine 2
- Co-authors
- Domenico E. Pellegrini‐GiampietroElisa LanducciFlavio MoroniElisabetta GeraceFiorella CasamentiAlberto ChiarugiElisa EvangelistiCristina Cecchi
- Partner nations
- ItalyAustraliaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Tania Scartabelli
18 papers receiving 517 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Developmental Neuroscience 52
- Neurology 93
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 197
- Aging 11
- Physiology 153
Countries citing papers authored by Tania Scartabelli
This map shows the geographic impact of Tania Scartabelli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tania Scartabelli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tania Scartabelli more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tania Scartabelli
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tania Scartabelli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tania Scartabelli. The network helps show where Tania Scartabelli may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tania Scartabelli, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 49 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 52 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 31 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 44 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 26 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 39 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 25 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 15 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 39 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 59 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 34 |
About Tania Scartabelli
Tania Scartabelli is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 18 papers that have together received 526 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (9 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (3 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (3 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (3 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (2 papers), Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection (2 papers) and Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (52 citations), Neurology (93 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (197 citations). Tania Scartabelli has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Domenico E. Pellegrini‐Giampietro, Elisa Landucci, Flavio Moroni, Elisabetta Gerace, Fiorella Casamenti, Alberto Chiarugi, Elisa Evangelisti, Cristina Cecchi, Francesca Tatini and Fabrizio Chiti. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Neuroscience and Journal of Neurochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.