T. W. Field

436 total citations
13 papers, 301 citations indexed

About

T. W. Field is a scholar working on Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, T. W. Field has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 301 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Education, 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 3 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in T. W. Field's work include Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (3 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (3 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers). T. W. Field is often cited by papers focused on Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (3 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (3 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers). T. W. Field collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. T. W. Field's co-authors include Millicent E. Poole, Arthur J. Cropley and Peter Rich and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Journal of Applied Psychology and Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

In The Last Decade

T. W. Field

12 papers receiving 250 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
T. W. Field Australia 8 171 49 45 42 32 13 301
Elias Blake United States 7 195 1.1× 64 1.3× 60 1.3× 48 1.1× 39 1.2× 10 358
Alma Hertweck 2 160 0.9× 52 1.1× 68 1.5× 12 0.3× 13 0.4× 2 268
Dorothy Heathcote United Kingdom 8 259 1.5× 72 1.5× 43 1.0× 36 0.9× 27 0.8× 12 494
Barbara J. Shade United States 11 338 2.0× 90 1.8× 104 2.3× 78 1.9× 59 1.8× 19 461
Sandra Weber Canada 6 276 1.6× 144 2.9× 42 0.9× 27 0.6× 36 1.1× 15 452
DeVon L. Yoho United States 2 322 1.9× 55 1.1× 107 2.4× 18 0.4× 33 1.0× 5 431
Lois Peak United States 7 194 1.1× 96 2.0× 30 0.7× 15 0.4× 56 1.8× 11 330
Marion Dadds United Kingdom 9 289 1.7× 86 1.8× 60 1.3× 19 0.5× 19 0.6× 20 398
Alfredo Castaneda United States 3 261 1.5× 93 1.9× 116 2.6× 52 1.2× 81 2.5× 6 440
Margaret Macintyre Latta United States 12 251 1.5× 79 1.6× 25 0.6× 36 0.9× 32 1.0× 49 392

Countries citing papers authored by T. W. Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. W. Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. W. Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. W. Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. W. Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. W. Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. W. Field. The network helps show where T. W. Field may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. W. Field

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. W. Field. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. W. Field based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T. W. Field. T. W. Field is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Field, T. W., et al.. (2011). Toward Development of Collaborative, Comprehensive Information Literacy and Research Skills Program inside the Journalism Curriculum. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator. 66(2). 175–186. 4 indexed citations
2.
Field, T. W., et al.. (1996). Teachers as Mentors: A Practical Guide. College Composition and Communication. 47(2). 303–303. 44 indexed citations
3.
Field, T. W.. (1985). The Australian educational researcher: 1979 to 1985. The Australian Educational Researcher. 12(4). 21–22. 148 indexed citations
4.
Poole, Millicent E. & T. W. Field. (1976). A Comparison of Oral and Written Code Elaboration. Language and Speech. 19(4). 305–312. 31 indexed citations
5.
Field, T. W., et al.. (1973). Teacher Differences as Perceived by Students. Improving College and University Teaching. 21(1). 64–66. 1 indexed citations
6.
Poole, Millicent E. & T. W. Field. (1972). Social Class and Code Elaboration in Written Communication. Language and Speech. 15(1). 1–7. 4 indexed citations
7.
Poole, Millicent E. & T. W. Field. (1971). Social Class and Code Elaboration in Oral Communication. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 14(2). 421–427. 4 indexed citations
8.
Field, T. W.. (1971). Some dimensions of a science cognitive style and their relevance for the classroom. Research in Science Education. 1(1). 19–27. 1 indexed citations
9.
Field, T. W., et al.. (1971). Identifying patterns of teacher behavior from student evaluations.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 55(5). 466–469. 10 indexed citations
10.
Field, T. W. & Millicent E. Poole. (1970). INTELLECTUAL STYLE AND ACHIEVEMENT OF ARTS AND SCIENCE UNDERGRADUATES. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 40(3). 338–341. 8 indexed citations
11.
Field, T. W. & Arthur J. Cropley. (1969). Cognitive style and science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 6(1). 2–10. 19 indexed citations
12.
Cropley, Arthur J. & T. W. Field. (1969). Achievement in science and intellectual style.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 53(2, Pt.1). 132–135. 15 indexed citations
13.
Cropley, Arthur J. & T. W. Field. (1968). Intellectual Style and High School Science. Nature. 217(5135). 1211–1212. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026