T. J. Bowles
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 2%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Radiation top 5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Mechanics of Materials
- Co-authors
- J. F. WilkersonR. G. H. RobertsonDavid A. KnappВ. Н. ГавринD. L. WarkE. P. VeretenkinG. J. StephensonA. V. Kalikhov
- Topics
- Neutrino Physics Research (21 papers)Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (16 papers)Atomic and Molecular Physics (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaIsrael
In The Last Decade
T. J. Bowles
49 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.1k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 350
- Radiation 157
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 89
- Mechanics of Materials 55
Countries citing papers authored by T. J. Bowles
This map shows the geographic impact of T. J. Bowles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. J. Bowles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. J. Bowles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by T. J. Bowles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. J. Bowles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. J. Bowles. The network helps show where T. J. Bowles may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. J. Bowles
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. J. Bowles. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. J. Bowles based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T. J. Bowles. T. J. Bowles is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Measurement of the solar neutrino capture rate with gallium metal, Part III | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | Measurement of The Solar Neutrino Capture Rate In SAGE | 2 |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | A Solid Deuterium Superthermal Source of Ultra-Cold Neutrons Coupled to Spallation Targets at LANSCE | 1 |
| 12 | Experimental study of a solid-deuterium source of ultracold neutrons | 4 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 82 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 51 | |
| 17 | 29 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 23 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About T. J. Bowles
T. J. Bowles is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neutrino Physics Research (21 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (16 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.1k citations), Radiation (157 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (350 citations). T. J. Bowles has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Israel. Frequent co-authors include J. F. Wilkerson, R. G. H. Robertson, David A. Knapp, В. Н. Гаврин, D. L. Wark, E. P. Veretenkin, G. J. Stephenson, A. V. Kalikhov, Г. Т. Зацепин and J. S. Nico. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Physical Review Letters and Physics Letters B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.