Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Measurement of the solar neutrino capture rate with gallium metal. III. Results for the 2002–2007 data-taking period
2009343 citationsJ. N. Abdurashitov, В. Н. Гаврин et al.Physical Review Cprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J. S. Nico's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. S. Nico with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. S. Nico more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. S. Nico. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. S. Nico. The network helps show where J. S. Nico may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. S. Nico
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. S. Nico.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. S. Nico based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. S. Nico. J. S. Nico is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bateman, F. B., B. Collett, M. S. Dewey, et al.. (2017). The aCORN backscatter-suppressed beta spectrometer. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 867. 51–57.7 indexed citations
Langford, T. J., et al.. (2014). Fast neutron detection with a segmented spectrometer. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 771. 78–87.14 indexed citations
Yue, Andrew, et al.. (2010). Calibration of the Neutron Lifetime Flux Monitor Through the Absolute Determination of Neutron Flux. Bulletin of the American Physical Society.1 indexed citations
14.
Abdurashitov, J. N., В. Н. Гаврин, V. V. Gorbachev, et al.. (2009). Measurement of the solar neutrino capture rate with gallium metal, Part III. arXiv (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
15.
Yue, Andrew, et al.. (2009). Progress Toward a Redetermination of the Neutron Lifetime Through the Absolute Determination of Neutron Flux. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 3.1 indexed citations
Dewey, M. S., M. Arif, T. Gentile, et al.. (2005). The fundamental neutron physics facilities at NIST. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 241(1-4). 213–217.6 indexed citations
18.
Nico, J. S., Muhammad Arif, M. S. Dewey, et al.. (2005). The fundamental neutron physics facilities at NIST. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. 110(3). 137–137.22 indexed citations
19.
Гаврин, В. Н., J. N. Abdurashitov, T. J. Bowles, et al.. (2003). Measurement of The Solar Neutrino Capture Rate In SAGE. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 118.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.