Sylvia Veit
- Public Administration top 2%
- Public Policy and Administration Research 9
-
- Public Administration and Political Analysis 11
- European history and politics 6
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation 3
- Social Policy and Reform Studies 3
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Political Influence and Corporate Strategies 6
- Law top 10%
- Law and Political Science 5
-
- German legal, social, and political studies 6
Sylvia Veit
24 papers receiving 279 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Public Administration 146
- Political Science and International Relations 195
- Strategy and Management 86
- Law 19
- Development 7
Countries citing papers authored by Sylvia Veit
This map shows the geographic impact of Sylvia Veit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sylvia Veit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sylvia Veit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sylvia Veit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sylvia Veit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sylvia Veit. The network helps show where Sylvia Veit may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Sylvia Veit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 69 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 17 | Verwaltungspolitik als Politikfeld | 2011 | 2 |
| 18 | Sunset Legislation and Better Regulation: Empirical Evidence from Four Countries | 2010 | 2 |
| 19 | Politicisation of administration or bureaucratisation of politics? : The case of Germany | 2010 | 6 |
| 20 | Gestaltung einer Nachhaltigkeitsprüfung im Rahmen der Gesetzesfolgenabschätzung : Studie der Freien Universität Berlin im Auftrag der Bertelsmann-Stiftung | 2009 | 1 |
About Sylvia Veit
Sylvia Veit is a scholar working on Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations, Law, Strategy and Management and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 40 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Public Administration and Political Analysis (11 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (9 papers), European history and politics (6 papers), German legal, social, and political studies (6 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (6 papers), Law and Political Science (5 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (146 citations), Political Science and International Relations (195 citations), Strategy and Management (86 citations), Law (19 citations) and Development (7 citations). Sylvia Veit has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Tobias Bach, Thurid Hustedt, Falk Ebinger, Christoph Reichard, Göttrik Wewer, Werner Jann, Klaus Jacob, Mandy Singer‐Brodowski, Otto Hüther and Marian Döhler. Their work appears in journals such as Public Administration, Policy Sciences, International Journal of Public Administration, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory and German Politics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.