Countries where authors publish in German Politics
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in German Politics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in German Politics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites German Politics more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in German Politics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in German Politics.
About German Politics
The 996 papers published in German Politics in the last decades have received a total of 8.0k indexed citations . Papers published in German Politics usually cover Political Science and International Relations (683 papers), Public Administration (27 papers) and Strategy and Management (110 papers) specifically the topics of Electoral Systems and Political Participation (199 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (197 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (141 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (137 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (104 papers), Public Administration and Political Analysis (94 papers), Political Systems and Governance (90 papers) and European history and politics (74 papers). The most active scholars publishing in German Politics are Peter A. Hall, Rüdiger Schmitt‐Beck, Simon Green, Jonathan Olsen, Charlie Jeffery, Susanne Lütz, Jasmin Siri, Christine Trampusch, Louise K. Davidson-Schmich and Marc Debus.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.