Sylvia K. Fields

15 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Sylvia K. Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Family Practice 141
  • Research and Theory 34
  • General Health Professions 659
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 366
  • Emergency Medical Services 162
Replace Dujeepa D. Samarasekera with:
Dujeepa D. Samarasekera Singapore
Daniel R. Wolpaw United States
Frank T. Stritter United States
Barret Michalec United States
Valmae Ypinazar Australia
Gill Morrow United Kingdom
Janet Grant United Kingdom
Jeff Sloan United States
Desmond Loong Canada
Elizabeth Bernabeo United States
Sylvia K. Fields relative to Dujeepa D. Samarasekera Singapore Dujeepa D. Samarasekera's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Dujeepa D. Samarasekera · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sylvia K. Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sylvia K. Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sylvia K. Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sylvia K. Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sylvia K. Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sylvia K. Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sylvia K. Fields. The network helps show where Sylvia K. Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sylvia K. Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sylvia K. Fields Line = papers co-authored together Sylvia K. Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2011175
2 2005166
3 2003146
4 1999138
5 2001125
6 1997115
7 2004100
8 200755
9 200353
10 199550
11 199730
12 197610
13 20084
14 19954
15 19962
16
Guide to patient evaluation : history taking, physical examination, and the nursing process
19881

About Sylvia K. Fields

Sylvia K. Fields is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Emergency Medical Services, Family Practice and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (5 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (3 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (3 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (2 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (2 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (141 citations), Research and Theory (34 citations), General Health Professions (659 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (366 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (162 citations). Sylvia K. Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Mohammadreza Hojat, J. Jon Veloski, Joseph S. Gonnella, Linda L. Blank, James R. Boex, Mitchell J. Cohen, Jeffrey D. Harris, James Plumb, Barbara Barzansky and Gang Xu. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, Evaluation & the Health Professions, Nursing Research, American Journal of Medical Quality and International Journal of Nursing Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact