Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Value co-creation: concept and measurement
2014838 citationsKumar Rakesh Ranjan, Stuart Readprofile →
Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: Differences between experts and novices
2008558 citationsNicholas Dew, Stuart Read et al.Journal of Business Venturingprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Read's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Read with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Read more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Read. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Read. The network helps show where Stuart Read may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stuart Read
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stuart Read.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stuart Read based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stuart Read. Stuart Read is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ranjan, Kumar Rakesh & Stuart Read. (2017). The Six Faces of Value Co-Creation: A Field Guide for Executives. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2(1). 23–31.3 indexed citations
4.
Dew, Nicholas, Stuart Read, Saras D. Sarasvathy, & Robert Wiltbank. (2015). Entrepreneurial expertise and the use of control. Journal of Business Venturing Insights. 4. 30–37.29 indexed citations
Donahue, Leah Rae, Martin Hrabě de Angelis, Craig L. Franklin, et al.. (2012). Centralized mouse repositories. Mammalian Genome. 23(9-10). 559–571.21 indexed citations
9.
Read, Stuart & Sharon Dolmans. (2012). Effectuation 10 year waypoint. Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin). 10(1). 25–46.8 indexed citations
Wiltbank, Robert, Nicholas Dew, Stuart Read, & Saras D. Sarasvathy. (2009). 'Effectual Versus Predictive Logics in Entrepreneurial Decision-Making: Differences between Experts and Novices'. SSRN Electronic Journal.29 indexed citations
Dew, Nicholas, Stuart Read, Saras D. Sarasvathy, & Robert Wiltbank. (2008). Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: Differences between experts and novices. Journal of Business Venturing. 24(4). 287–309.558 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Wiltbank, Robert, Saras D. Sarasvathy, Nicholas Dew, & Stuart Read. (2007). Effectual entrepreneurial expertise: existence and bounds.2 indexed citations
Read, Stuart. (2001). Like WTO, Why not WCO?. Journal of Universal Language. 2(1). 61–69.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.