Stow Persons
Impact in
- General Psychology top 10%
- History top 1%
Papers in
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 8
- Academic Freedom and Politics 3
-
- Race, History, and American Society 4
- Canadian Identity and History 2
- Religion and Society Interactions 1
- Co-authors
- Daniel Bell (1 shared paper)Thomas Bender (1 shared paper)Thomas J. Archdeacon (1 shared paper)Alexandra Oleson (1 shared paper)John C. Voss (1 shared paper)David A. Shannon (1 shared paper)Henry F. May (2 shared papers)Paul Boyer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of American History (7 papers)The American Historical Review (6 papers)American Quarterly (6 papers)The Journal of Southern History (4 papers)The William and Mary Quarterly (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Stow Persons
44 papers receiving 378 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- General Psychology 19
- History 102
- History and Philosophy of Science 32
- Marketing 65
- Sociology and Political Science 256
Countries citing papers authored by Stow Persons
This map shows the geographic impact of Stow Persons's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stow Persons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stow Persons more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stow Persons
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stow Persons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stow Persons. The network helps show where Stow Persons may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stow Persons, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1960 | 55 | |
| 2 | 1976 | 53 | |
| 3 | 1980 | 50 | |
| 4 | 1957 | 49 | |
| 5 | 1988 | 41 | |
| 6 | 1956 | 26 | |
| 7 | 1988 | 25 | |
| 8 | 1953 | 25 | |
| 9 | 1969 | 22 | |
| 10 | 1960 | 20 | |
| 11 | 1970 | 19 | |
| 12 | 1951 | 17 | |
| 13 | 1969 | 15 | |
| 14 | 1966 | 14 | |
| 15 | 1953 | 12 | |
| 16 | 1959 | 12 | |
| 17 | 1952 | 12 | |
| 18 | 1974 | 12 | |
| 19 | 1951 | 10 | |
| 20 | 1974 | 9 |
About Stow Persons
Stow Persons is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Marketing, History and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 52 papers that have together received 609 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (8 papers), Race, History, and American Society (4 papers), Academic Freedom and Politics (3 papers), American History and Culture (3 papers), Mormonism, Religion, and History (2 papers), Canadian Identity and History (2 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (1 paper) and Evolution and Science Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (19 citations), History (102 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (32 citations), Marketing (65 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (256 citations). Stow Persons has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Bell, Thomas Bender, Thomas J. Archdeacon, Alexandra Oleson, John C. Voss, David A. Shannon, Henry F. May, Paul Boyer, Philip P. Wiener and Dianne M. Pinderhughes. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, The American Historical Review, American Quarterly, The Journal of Southern History and The William and Mary Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.