Steve O’Connor

721 citations
33 papers · 570 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Steve O’Connor

31 papers receiving 540 citations

Peers

Steve O’Connor
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Library and Information Sciences 48
  • Electrochemistry 125
  • Conservation 54
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 294
  • Information Systems 106
Replace Elizabeth Brown with:
Elizabeth Brown United States
Stephen Bales United States
Prateeti Chakraborty India
Thomas C. Wright United States
Robert Tomaszewski United States
Zhen‐Zhen Xue China
Laura E. Pence United States
Michael J. Powers United States
Ming‐Xia Li China
Steve O’Connor relative to Elizabeth Brown United States Elizabeth Brown's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.8×
Elizabeth Brown · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steve O’Connor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve O’Connor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve O’Connor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve O’Connor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve O’Connor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve O’Connor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve O’Connor. The network helps show where Steve O’Connor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Steve O’Connor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steve O’Connor Line = papers co-authored together Steve O’Connor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999367
2 201046
3 200224
4 201420
5 200819
6 200415
7 20089
8 20048
9 20058
10 20006
11 19895
12 20145
13 20004
14 20074
15 20084
16 19974
17 19983
18 20082
19 20172
20 19992

About Steve O’Connor

Steve O’Connor is a scholar working on Information Systems, Library and Information Sciences, Conservation, Museology and Marketing, having authored 33 papers that have together received 570 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (9 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (8 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (5 papers), Copyright and Intellectual Property (2 papers), Library Science and Administration (2 papers), Web and Library Services (2 papers), Museums and Cultural Heritage (2 papers) and Open Education and E-Learning (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (48 citations), Electrochemistry (125 citations), Conservation (54 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (294 citations) and Information Systems (106 citations). Steve O’Connor has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Stephen E. Creager, Eric Lam, Cilong Yu, Jiye Luo, Michael Gozin, Jon Faiz Kayyem, Evren Dilektaşlı, Mehmet Mahir Özmen, Steve George and Deborah Fitzsimmons. Their work appears in journals such as Library Management, Library Hi Tech, Library Collections Acquisitions and Technical Services, Australian Academic & Research Libraries and Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact