Stephen R. Foster

25 total papers · 584 total citations
20 papers, 412 citations indexed

About

Stephen R. Foster is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen R. Foster has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 412 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Computer Science Applications, 6 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 3 papers in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in Stephen R. Foster's work include Teaching and Learning Programming (6 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (6 papers) and Digital Games and Media (3 papers). Stephen R. Foster is often cited by papers focused on Teaching and Learning Programming (6 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (6 papers) and Digital Games and Media (3 papers). Stephen R. Foster collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and United Kingdom. Stephen R. Foster's co-authors include William G. Griswold, Sorin Lerner, Ekaterina I. Galanzha, Vladimir P. Zharov, Dmitry A. Nedosekin, Gohar Azhar, Mustafa Sarimollaoglu, Jeanne Y. Wei, Laura F. Hutchins and Beth Simon and has published in prestigious journals such as Science Translational Medicine, Drug Metabolism Reviews and Discrete Applied Mathematics.

In The Last Decade

Stephen R. Foster

19 papers receiving 399 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Stephen R. Foster	136	107	94	74	45	20	412
Tzu-Yi Chen	153 1.1×	91 0.9×	17 0.2×	30 0.4×	20 0.4×	38	428
Rui Zhi	247 1.8×	134 1.3×	29 0.3×	67 0.9×	34 0.8×	27	463
Kevin Thai	92 0.7×	22 0.2×	31 0.3×	16 0.2×	11 0.2×	18	441
Lucia Dettori	119 0.9×	34 0.3×	33 0.4×	30 0.4×	7 0.2×	28	383
Yuxin Ma	151 1.1×	86 0.8×	26 0.3×	54 0.7×	5 0.1×	31	418
Daniel Tang	21 0.2×	30 0.3×	16 0.2×	28 0.4×	8 0.2×	17	439
Olivier Bill	164 1.2×	107 1.0×	10 0.1×	68 0.9×	12 0.3×	16	373
Kory W. Mathewson	15 0.1×	16 0.1×	86 0.9×	36 0.5×	6 0.1×	22	411
Zhilin Zheng	235 1.7×	46 0.4×	19 0.2×	43 0.6×	1 0.0×	22	452
Katherine Hayden	36 0.3×	46 0.4×	13 0.1×	30 0.4×	3 0.1×	18	455

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen R. Foster

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen R. Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen R. Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen R. Foster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen R. Foster

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen R. Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen R. Foster. The network helps show where Stephen R. Foster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen R. Foster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen R. Foster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen R. Foster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen R. Foster. Stephen R. Foster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact