Stephen Innes
- Anthropology top 5%
- Colonialism, slavery, and trade 2
- Marketing top 10%
- American History and Culture 8
- History top 5%
- Cultural Studies top 10%
-
- American Environmental and Regional History 10
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 5
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 5
-
- Australian History and Society 3
- Race, History, and American Society 3
-
- Architecture, Design, and Social History 2
- Co-authors
- Christopher D. ClarkWilliam CrononLorena S. WalshT. H. BreenJames R. HornMechal SobelKevin KellyKenneth A. Lockridge
- Cited by
- AnthropologyMarketingHistory
- Journals
- The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (6 papers)The William and Mary Quarterly (6 papers)The American Historical Review (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Stephen Innes
26 papers receiving 166 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Anthropology 87
- Marketing 63
- History 28
- Cultural Studies 22
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 30
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Innes
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Innes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Innes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Innes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Innes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Innes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Innes. The network helps show where Stephen Innes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Innes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 9 | |
| 5 | The New Zealand and Pacific Collection at the University of Auckland | 1996 | 0 |
| 6 | 1995 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 62 | |
| 9 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1989 | 16 | |
| 11 | 1989 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1989 | 32 | |
| 13 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1984 | 15 | |
| 15 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1983 | 11 | |
| 17 | 1983 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1981 | 26 | |
| 19 | 1981 | 14 | |
| 20 | 1978 | 6 |
About Stephen Innes
Stephen Innes is a scholar working on Marketing, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Conservation, Anthropology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 32 papers that have together received 266 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Environmental and Regional History (10 papers), American History and Culture (8 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (5 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (5 papers), Australian History and Society (3 papers), Race, History, and American Society (3 papers), Architecture, Design, and Social History (2 papers) and Colonialism, slavery, and trade (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (87 citations), Marketing (63 citations), History (28 citations), Cultural Studies (22 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (30 citations). Stephen Innes has collaborated with scholars based in United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Christopher D. Clark, William Cronon, Lorena S. Walsh, T. H. Breen, James R. Horn, Mechal Sobel, Kevin Kelly, Kenneth A. Lockridge, Robert J. Cottrol and Alan M. Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, The William and Mary Quarterly, The American Historical Review, Journal of American History and Reviews in American History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.