Mechal Sobel

752 citations
17 papers · 259 · h-index 9

Impact in

    • Colonialism, slavery, and trade
    • Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • History top 5%
    • Mormonism, Religion, and History

Papers in

Mechal Sobel

16 papers receiving 149 citations

Peers

Mechal Sobel
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Anthropology 101
  • History 49
  • Cultural Studies 38
  • Religious studies 18
  • Marketing 28
Replace James Oliver Horton with:
James Oliver Horton United States
Richard P. Gildrie United States
Charles W. Joyner
Mary Baine Campbell United Kingdom
Leonard Tennenhouse
Edmund Wilson United States
Geneviève Fabre United States
J. A. Leo Lemay United States
Christine Mullen Kreamer United States
Marcus Wood United Kingdom
Mechal Sobel relative to James Oliver Horton United States James Oliver Horton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
James Oliver Horton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mechal Sobel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mechal Sobel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mechal Sobel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mechal Sobel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mechal Sobel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mechal Sobel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mechal Sobel. The network helps show where Mechal Sobel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Mechal Sobel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mechal Sobel Line = papers co-authored together Mechal Sobel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 198956
2 198048
3 198743
4 199840
5 198012
6 199011
7 198010
8 20019
9 19899
10 19885
11 20004
12 19883
13 19893
14 19833
15 20022
16
Hannah Barnard’s Cupboard: Female Property and Identity in Eighteenth-century New England
19971
17 20000

About Mechal Sobel

Mechal Sobel is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology, Marketing and Religious studies, having authored 17 papers that have together received 259 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Race, History, and American Society (5 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (3 papers), American History and Culture (2 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (1 paper), Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (1 paper) and Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (101 citations), History (49 citations), Cultural Studies (38 citations), Religious studies (18 citations) and Marketing (28 citations). Mechal Sobel has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Winthrop D. Jordan, John H. Stanfield, Jill Lepore, Ronald Hoffman, Albert Jordy Raboteau, Charles B. Dew, Ann Fabian, Stephen Innes, Russell R. Menard and Steven M. Stowe. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, Journal of the Early Republic, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, The William and Mary Quarterly and The American Historical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact