Stephen Hawk

751 citations
19 papers · 420 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Hawk

17 papers receiving 369 citations

Peers

Stephen Hawk
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Management Information Systems 164
  • Information Systems and Management 101
  • Business and International Management 15
  • Communication 50
  • Strategy and Management 106
Replace Robey with:
Robey United States
Nicolau Reinhard Brazil
Xiang Fang United States
Samir Blili Canada
Choong Kwon Lee South Korea
Anne Hoag United States
Ojiabo Ukoha United States
Michael Kyobe South Africa
Pieter Van Brakel South Africa
Val Hooper New Zealand
Stephen Hawk relative to Robey United States Robey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Robey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Hawk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Hawk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Hawk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Hawk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Hawk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Hawk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Hawk. The network helps show where Stephen Hawk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Hawk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Hawk Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Hawk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1
Evolution of Offshore Software Development: From Outsourcing to Cosourcing
200483
2 200874
3 200469
4 198836
5 199429
6 201228
7 198925
8 200521
9 199115
10
Overcoming Knowledge-Transfer Barriers in Infrastructure Management Outsourcing: Lessons from a Case Study
200914
11 19937
12 20026
13 20115
14 19953
15 19902
16 19901
17 20151
18 20051
19 20060

About Stephen Hawk

Stephen Hawk is a scholar working on Information Systems, Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management, Information Systems and Management and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 19 papers that have together received 420 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development (6 papers), Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (4 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (4 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (3 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (2 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (2 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (164 citations), Information Systems and Management (101 citations), Business and International Management (15 citations), Communication (50 citations) and Strategy and Management (106 citations). Stephen Hawk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Kate M. Kaiser, Tim Goles, Brian L. Dos Santos, William K. McHenry, Nambury S. Raju, Weijun Zheng, Robert W. Zmud, Keith Frampton, Martin L. Bariff and Judith C. Simon. Their work appears in journals such as Information & Management, Decision Sciences, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Information Systems Management and Information Systems Frontiers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact