Keith Frampton

646 total citations
19 papers, 358 citations indexed

About

Keith Frampton is a scholar working on Information Systems, Management Information Systems and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Keith Frampton has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 358 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Information Systems, 11 papers in Management Information Systems and 6 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Keith Frampton's work include Information Technology Governance and Strategy (8 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (6 papers) and ERP Systems Implementation and Impact (6 papers). Keith Frampton is often cited by papers focused on Information Technology Governance and Strategy (8 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (6 papers) and ERP Systems Implementation and Impact (6 papers). Keith Frampton collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Spain. Keith Frampton's co-authors include Caspar Ryan, Mikhail Perepletchikov, Graeme Shanks, Toomas Tamm, Zahir Tari, Ida Someh, Marianne Gloet, Heinz Schmidt, Shuk Ying Ho and Tim Goles and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the Association for Information Systems, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems and Information Systems Management.

In The Last Decade

Keith Frampton

18 papers receiving 329 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Keith Frampton Australia 9 232 151 131 73 34 19 358
Till Janner Switzerland 10 227 1.0× 119 0.8× 84 0.6× 118 1.6× 27 0.8× 27 342
Alexander Dreiling Germany 9 239 1.0× 266 1.8× 136 1.0× 45 0.6× 21 0.6× 30 390
Sourobh Ghosh United States 7 239 1.0× 137 0.9× 152 1.2× 58 0.8× 30 0.9× 14 315
Timo Käkölä Finland 10 167 0.7× 119 0.8× 94 0.7× 34 0.5× 28 0.8× 41 275
Mārīte Kirikova Latvia 8 148 0.6× 101 0.7× 68 0.5× 70 1.0× 17 0.5× 78 285
Padmal Vitharana United States 12 264 1.1× 106 0.7× 163 1.2× 51 0.7× 64 1.9× 23 403
Amjad Umar United States 8 150 0.6× 92 0.6× 78 0.6× 84 1.2× 10 0.3× 34 280
Frank Harmsen Netherlands 9 314 1.4× 211 1.4× 112 0.9× 46 0.6× 20 0.6× 28 420
Monalessa Perini Barcellos Brazil 10 208 0.9× 125 0.8× 115 0.9× 49 0.7× 8 0.2× 75 325
Dirk Stelzer Germany 10 222 1.0× 188 1.2× 36 0.3× 38 0.5× 57 1.7× 37 381

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Frampton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Frampton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Frampton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Frampton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Frampton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Frampton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Frampton. The network helps show where Keith Frampton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Keith Frampton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Keith Frampton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Keith Frampton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Keith Frampton. Keith Frampton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Shanks, Graeme, Marianne Gloet, Ida Someh, Keith Frampton, & Toomas Tamm. (2018). Achieving benefits with enterprise architecture. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 27(2). 139–156. 69 indexed citations
2.
Someh, Ida, Keith Frampton, Michael Davern, & Graeme Shanks. (2016). The role of synergy in using enterprise architecture for business transformation. European Conference on Information Systems. 7 indexed citations
3.
Tamm, Toomas, Peter B. Seddon, Graeme Shanks, Peter Reynolds, & Keith Frampton. (2015). How an Australian retailer enabled business transformation through enterprise architecture. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 14(4). 181–193. 26 indexed citations
4.
Frampton, Keith, Graeme Shanks, Toomas Tamm, Sherah Kurnia, & Simon K. Milton. (2015). Enterprise Architecture Service Provision: Pathways to Value. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 9 indexed citations
5.
Hawk, Stephen, et al.. (2012). The Information Technology Workforce: A Comparison of Critical Skills of Clients and Service Providers. Information Systems Management. 29(1). 2–12. 28 indexed citations
6.
Kaiser, Kate M., et al.. (2011). Information Systems Skills Differences Between High-Wage and Low-Wage Regions: Implications for Global Sourcing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2 indexed citations
7.
Kaiser, Kate M., Tim Goles, Stephen Hawk, Judith C. Simon, & Keith Frampton. (2011). Information Systems Skills Differences Between High-Wage and Low-Wage Regions: Implications for Global Sourcing. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 29. 5 indexed citations
8.
Ho, Shuk Ying & Keith Frampton. (2010). A Competency Model for the Information Technology Workforce: Implications for Training and Selection. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 27. 13 indexed citations
9.
Perepletchikov, Mikhail, Caspar Ryan, Keith Frampton, & Heinz Schmidt. (2008). Formalising Service-Oriented Design. Journal of Software. 3(2). 21 indexed citations
10.
Perepletchikov, Mikhail, Caspar Ryan, Keith Frampton, & Heinz Schmidt. (2007). A formal model of service-orientated design structure. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library). 6 indexed citations
11.
Perepletchikov, Mikhail, Caspar Ryan, Keith Frampton, & Heinz Schmidt. (2007). A Formal Model of Service-Oriented Design Structure. 8. 71–80. 12 indexed citations
12.
Gallagher, Kevin, Kate M. Kaiser, Keith Frampton, & Vickie Coleman Gallagher. (2007). Best practice for grooming critical mid-level roles. 15–19. 3 indexed citations
13.
Perepletchikov, Mikhail, Caspar Ryan, Keith Frampton, & Zahir Tari. (2007). Coupling Metrics for Predicting Maintainability in Service-Oriented Designs. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library). 329–340. 76 indexed citations
14.
Carroll, Jennie, et al.. (2007). The Application of an Information Systems Development Methodology in Practice – An Exploratory Study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 95. 1 indexed citations
15.
Perepletchikov, Mikhail, Caspar Ryan, & Keith Frampton. (2007). Cohesion Metrics for Predicting Maintainability of Service-Oriented Software. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library). 328–335. 71 indexed citations
16.
Frampton, Keith, et al.. (2006). Information technology architects. 221–229. 3 indexed citations
17.
Frampton, Keith, James A. Thom, & Jennie Carroll. (2006). Enhancing IT Architect capabilities: Experiences within a university subject. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1–11. 3 indexed citations
18.
Frampton, Keith, et al.. (2005). A Study of the In-Practice Application of a Commercial Software Architecture. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library). 1992. 292–301. 2 indexed citations
19.
Frampton, Keith, et al.. (2004). How Do Experienced Architects Use Architecture Development Methods. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026