Stephen H. Pearce
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Insect Science top 5%
- Ecology
- Environmental Engineering top 10%
- Co-authors
- G. R. OliverPeter N. BeetsMark O. KimberleyLoretta G. GarrettJ. F. GardnerJake D. GrahamI. A. HoodM. R. Davis
- Topics
- Forest ecology and management (9 papers)Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (9 papers)Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandCanadaTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Stephen H. Pearce
22 papers receiving 403 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 219
- Global and Planetary Change 190
- Insect Science 173
- Ecology 95
- Environmental Engineering 91
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen H. Pearce
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen H. Pearce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen H. Pearce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen H. Pearce more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen H. Pearce
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen H. Pearce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen H. Pearce. The network helps show where Stephen H. Pearce may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen H. Pearce
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen H. Pearce. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen H. Pearce based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen H. Pearce. Stephen H. Pearce is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 63 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | Carbon accumulation in two Pinus radiata stands in the North Island of New Zealand. | 8 |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | 39 | |
| 15 | 54 | |
| 16 | ROOT/SHOOT RATIOS FOR DERIVING BELOW-GROUND BIOMASS OF PINUS RADIATA STANDS | 29 |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 37 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 27 |
About Stephen H. Pearce
Stephen H. Pearce is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Insect Science and Soil Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 438 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (9 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (9 papers) and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (219 citations), Insect Science (173 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (190 citations). Stephen H. Pearce has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Canada and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include G. R. Oliver, Peter N. Beets, Mark O. Kimberley, Loretta G. Garrett, J. F. Gardner, Jake D. Graham, I. A. Hood, M. R. Davis, Thomas Paul and Peter W. Clinton. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Forests and Soil Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.