Graham Coker

556 total citations
24 papers, 453 citations indexed

About

Graham Coker is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Graham Coker has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 453 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 10 papers in Plant Science and 7 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Graham Coker's work include Forest ecology and management (9 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (5 papers). Graham Coker is often cited by papers focused on Forest ecology and management (9 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (5 papers). Graham Coker collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, France and Australia. Graham Coker's co-authors include B. Richardson, Michael S. Watt, Peter W. Clinton, Murray R. Davis, Roger L. Parfitt, Robyn Simcock, John Dando, Mark O. Kimberley, Loretta G. Garrett and Craig Ross and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Plant and Soil and Forest Ecology and Management.

In The Last Decade

Graham Coker

23 papers receiving 397 citations

Peers

Countries citing papers authored by Graham Coker

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graham Coker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham Coker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham Coker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Graham Coker

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham Coker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham Coker. The network helps show where Graham Coker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Graham Coker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Graham Coker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Graham Coker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Graham Coker. Graham Coker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

#	Work	Indexed citations
1	Assessing the impacts of experimental mid-rotation forest fertiliser treatments on water quality 2024 ·New Zealand journal of forestry science ·Brenda R. Baillie, (unknown), Graham Coker	1
2	Stakeholder valuation of soil ecosystem services from New Zealand’s planted forests 2019 ·PLoS ONE ·Graham Coker, (unknown), Karen Bayne, Simeon J. Smaill, Loretta G. Garrett, Amanda Matson, Steven A. Wakelin	2
3	Optimising spot weed control regimes for Pinus radiata plantations 2019 ·Canadian Journal of Forest Research ·B. Richardson, Mark O. Kimberley, Carol A. Rolando, Graham Coker, (unknown)	4
4	Field-scale variability in site conditions explain phenotypic plasticity in response to nitrogen source in Pinus radiata D. Don 2019 ·Plant and Soil ·Marta Gallart, Jonathan Love, Dean F. Meason, Graham Coker, Peter W. Clinton, Jianming Xue, Paula E. Jameson, Jaroslav Klápště, Matthew H. Turnbull	9
5	Using the age shift method to determine gains from weed management for Pinus radiata in New Zealand 2015 ·Weed Research ·Michael S. Watt, Carol A. Rolando, Mark O. Kimberley, Graham Coker	7
6	The Right Tree for the Job? Perceptions of Species Suitability for the Provision of Ecosystem Services 2014 ·Environmental Management ·Simeon J. Smaill, Karen Bayne, Graham Coker, Thomas Paul, Peter W. Clinton	15
7	Aerial Application of Pheromones for Mating Disruption of an Invasive Moth as a Potential Eradication Tool 2012 ·PLoS ONE ·Eckehard G. Brockerhoff, D. M. Suckling, Mark O. Kimberley, B. Richardson, Graham Coker, (unknown), (unknown), (unknown), D. R. Lance, Tara Strand, Aijun Zhang	32
8	Nitrogen leaching after fertilising young Pinus radiata plantations in New Zealand 2012 ·Forest Ecology and Management ·Murray R. Davis, Graham Coker, Michael S. Watt, (unknown), Stephen H. Pearce, John Dando	13
9	Soil quality relationships with tree growth in exotic forests in New Zealand 2009 ·Forest Ecology and Management ·Craig Ross, Michael S. Watt, Roger L. Parfitt, Robyn Simcock, John Dando, Graham Coker, Peter W. Clinton, Murray R. Davis	23
10	Identification of key soil indicators influencing plantation productivity and sustainability across a national trial series in New Zealand 2008 ·Forest Ecology and Management ·Michael S. Watt, Murray R. Davis, Peter W. Clinton, Graham Coker, Craig Ross, John Dando, Roger L. Parfitt, Robyn Simcock	35
11	Modelling the influence of weed competition on growth of young Pinus radiata. Development and parameterization of a hybrid model across an environmental gradient 2007 ·Canadian Journal of Forest Research ·Michael S. Watt, Mark O. Kimberley, Graham Coker, B. Richardson, (unknown)	12
12	Modelling the influence of environment and stand characteristics on basic density and modulus of elasticity for young Pinus radiata and Cupressus lusitanica 2007 ·Forest Ecology and Management ·Michael S. Watt, Peter W. Clinton, Graham Coker, Murray R. Davis, Robyn Simcock, Roger L. Parfitt, John Dando	23
13	Modelling the influence of stand structural, edaphic and climatic influences on juvenile Pinus radiata dynamic modulus of elasticity 2006 ·Forest Ecology and Management ·Michael S. Watt, John R. Moore, (unknown), Geoffrey M. Downes, Peter W. Clinton, Graham Coker, Murray R. Davis, Robyn Simcock, Roger L. Parfitt, John Dando, Euan G. Mason, Horacio E. Bown	62
14	Defining sustainability of plantation forests through identification of site quality indicators influencing productivity—A national view for New Zealand 2005 ·Forest Ecology and Management ·Michael S. Watt, Graham Coker, Peter W. Clinton, Murray R. Davis, Roger L. Parfitt, Robyn Simcock, Loretta G. Garrett, T. W. Payn, B. Richardson, (unknown)	49
15	Validation of SpraySafe Manager, an aerial herbicide application decision support system 1999 ·Canadian Journal of Forest Research ·(unknown), Brian Richardson, (unknown), Milton E. Teske, (unknown), Graham Coker	2
16	Indices of interspecific plant competition for Pinus radiata in the central north island of New Zealand 1999 ·Canadian Journal of Forest Research ·B. Richardson, Mark O. Kimberley, (unknown), Graham Coker	39
17	Herbicide efficacy in relation to herbicide rate, surfactant rate and spray application volume 1999 ·Proceedings of the New Zealand Weed Control Conference ·(unknown), B. Richardson, (unknown), Graham Coker	1
18	Mechanisms of Pinus radiata growth suppression by some common forest weed species. 1996 ·New Zealand journal of forestry science ·B. Richardson, (unknown), (unknown), (unknown), Graham Coker	64
19	Determination of the no observable effect level (NOEL) for four commonly used forestry herbicides on tomatoes 1996 ·Proceedings of the New Zealand Weed Control Conference ·(unknown), (unknown), B. Richardson, Graham Coker	2
20	The ultimate spot: optimising spot weed control. 1995 ·(unknown), (unknown), Graham Coker, (unknown), (unknown), (unknown)	2

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact