Peter W. Clinton

3.9k citations
116 papers · 3.0k indexed · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

Peter W. Clinton

113 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Peter W. Clinton
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.1k
  • Soil Science 817
  • Insect Science 511
  • Global and Planetary Change 832
  • Ecology 777
Replace Kate H. Orwin with:
Kate H. Orwin New Zealand
Alison D. Munson Canada
James W. Fyles Canada
Oskar Franklin Austria
Daniel S. Maynard United States
Bengt A. Olsson Sweden
Bo Tan China
Marcos Fernández‐Martínez Spain
Pasi Rautio Finland
Zhiqun Huang China
Peter W. Clinton relative to Kate H. Orwin New Zealand Kate H. Orwin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Kate H. Orwin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter W. Clinton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter W. Clinton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter W. Clinton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter W. Clinton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter W. Clinton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter W. Clinton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter W. Clinton. The network helps show where Peter W. Clinton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter W. Clinton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter W. Clinton Line = papers co-authored together Peter W. Clinton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20252
2 20244
3 20231
4 202322
5 20225
6 201811
7 20185
8 20183
9 201736
10
Nutrient supply one rotation to the next.
20157
11 201116
12
Towards green markets for New Zealand plantations.
20099
13 200915
14 200952
15 20082
16 2008155
17
Occurence of arbuscular mycorrhiza and extomycorrhiza on Leptospermum scoparium from the Rakaia catchment, Canterbury.
200711
18 20058
19 199914
20 199827

About Peter W. Clinton

Peter W. Clinton is a scholar working on Soil Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Insect Science and Environmental Chemistry, having authored 116 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (45 papers), Forest ecology and management (33 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (23 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (20 papers), Forest Management and Policy (14 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (14 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (14 papers) and Tree Root and Stability Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.1k citations), Soil Science (817 citations), Insect Science (511 citations), Global and Planetary Change (832 citations) and Ecology (777 citations). Peter W. Clinton has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Robert B. Allen, Murray R. Davis, Simeon J. Smaill, Michael S. Watt, M. R. Davis, Leo M. Condron, Susan K. Wiser, Kevin H. Platt, Euan G. Mason and Zhiqun Huang. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, Tree Physiology and Plant and Soil.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026