Thomas Paul

902 total citations
38 papers, 587 citations indexed

About

Thomas Paul is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Paul has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 587 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 18 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 15 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in Thomas Paul's work include Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (14 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (14 papers) and Forest ecology and management (13 papers). Thomas Paul is often cited by papers focused on Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (14 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (14 papers) and Forest ecology and management (13 papers). Thomas Paul collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and Chile. Thomas Paul's co-authors include Mark O. Kimberley, Peter N. Beets, Michael S. Watt, Jonathan P. Dash, Justin Morgenroth, Grant D. Pearse, N. J. Ledgard, David M. Richardson, Agostina Torres and Romina D. Dimarco and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Remote Sensing of Environment and Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Paul

35 papers receiving 562 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas Paul New Zealand 13 301 234 205 189 186 38 587
Ugo Chiavetta Italy 16 280 0.9× 321 1.4× 193 0.9× 182 1.0× 276 1.5× 49 710
Toby Jackson United Kingdom 17 450 1.5× 287 1.2× 210 1.0× 419 2.2× 130 0.7× 31 747
Jonas Glatthorn Germany 13 265 0.9× 203 0.9× 112 0.5× 110 0.6× 148 0.8× 26 420
Nils Nölke Germany 12 171 0.6× 170 0.7× 184 0.9× 217 1.1× 68 0.4× 32 516
Robert Nuske Germany 8 210 0.7× 170 0.7× 131 0.6× 144 0.8× 80 0.4× 8 431
Fabio Meloni Italy 10 248 0.8× 219 0.9× 118 0.6× 97 0.5× 192 1.0× 26 462
Aksel Granhus Norway 16 418 1.4× 309 1.3× 143 0.7× 199 1.1× 183 1.0× 60 704
Diego Giuliarelli Italy 13 121 0.4× 149 0.6× 146 0.7× 149 0.8× 113 0.6× 23 367
Géraldine Derroire France 14 386 1.3× 322 1.4× 139 0.7× 124 0.7× 56 0.3× 32 626
Minna Räty Finland 13 297 1.0× 202 0.9× 150 0.7× 311 1.6× 171 0.9× 30 523

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Paul

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Paul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Paul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Paul more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Paul

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Paul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Paul. The network helps show where Thomas Paul may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Paul

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Paul. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Paul based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Paul. Thomas Paul is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Scott, Matthew B., et al.. (2025). Reproductive trait shift in Pinus contorta helps explain invasion success in Aotearoa New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 1 indexed citations
2.
Scott, Matthew B., et al.. (2025). Hiding in plain sight: Reinvasion risk from retained seed after dispersal events in introduced conifers. Trees Forests and People. 20. 100852–100852. 1 indexed citations
3.
4.
Rolando, Carol A., et al.. (2024). Impacts of herbicides used for control of invasive Pinus contorta on the potential for reinvasion and germination of restoration species. Invasive Plant Science and Management. 17(4). 287–296. 1 indexed citations
5.
Paul, Thomas, et al.. (2024). Conifer samara structure diverges across the height of the tree crown. Proceedings of the New Zealand Weed Control Conference. 77. 1–7. 2 indexed citations
6.
Rolando, Carol A., et al.. (2024). Optimising aerial herbicide treatment for control of dense conifer infestations: a New Zealand case study. Pest Management Science. 81(4). 2144–2154. 1 indexed citations
7.
Paul, Thomas, Loretta G. Garrett, & Simeon J. Smaill. (2024). Afforestation using a range of tree species, in New Zealand: New Forest trial series establishment, site description, and initial data. Data in Brief. 54. 110321–110321. 1 indexed citations
8.
9.
Paul, Thomas, et al.. (2024). The enemy of my enemy… Exotic mammals present biotic resistance against invasive alien conifers. Biological Invasions. 26(8). 2647–2662. 3 indexed citations
10.
Rolando, Carol A., et al.. (2023). Persistence of triclopyr, dicamba, and picloram in the environment following aerial spraying for control of dense pine invasion. Invasive Plant Science and Management. 16(3). 177–190. 4 indexed citations
11.
Jones, Alan G., Andrew G. Cridge, Stuart Fraser, et al.. (2023). Transitional forestry in New Zealand: re‐evaluating the design and management of forest systems through the lens of forest purpose. Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 98(4). 1003–1015. 6 indexed citations
12.
Lawrence, Daniel A., et al.. (2020). Estimating New Zealand’s harvested wood products carbon stocks and stock changes. Carbon Balance and Management. 15(1). 10–10. 11 indexed citations
13.
Mason, Norman W. H., Olivia R. Burge, Robbie Price, et al.. (2020). Integrating across knowledge systems to drive action on chronic biological invasions. Biological Invasions. 23(2). 407–432. 11 indexed citations
14.
Paul, Thomas, et al.. (2020). ROAD SEGMENTATION ON LOW RESOLUTION LIDAR POINT CLOUDS FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. V-2-2020. 335–342. 7 indexed citations
15.
Beets, Peter N., Mark O. Kimberley, Loretta G. Garrett, Thomas Paul, & Amanda Matson. (2019). Soil productivity drivers in New Zealand planted forests. Forest Ecology and Management. 449. 117480–117480. 11 indexed citations
16.
Smaill, Simeon J., Karen Bayne, Graham Coker, Thomas Paul, & Peter W. Clinton. (2014). The Right Tree for the Job? Perceptions of Species Suitability for the Provision of Ecosystem Services. Environmental Management. 53(4). 783–799. 15 indexed citations
17.
Paul, Thomas, et al.. (2012). Maximum likelihood multiple imputation: A more efficient approach to repairing and analyzing incomplete data. arXiv (Cornell University). 2 indexed citations
18.
Beets, Peter N., et al.. (2012). The national inventory of carbon stock in New Zealand’s pre-1990 planted forest using a LiDAR incomplete-transect approach. Forest Ecology and Management. 280. 187–197. 18 indexed citations
19.
Beets, Peter N., et al.. (2011). The inventory of carbon stock in New Zealand’s post-1989 planted forest for reporting under the Kyoto protocol. Forest Ecology and Management. 262(6). 1119–1130. 27 indexed citations
20.
Brockerhoff, Eckehard G., et al.. (2008). Re-examination of recent loss of indigenous cover in New Zealand and the relative contributions of different land uses.. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 32(1). 115–126. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ugo Chiavetta Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Toby Jackson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jonas Glatthorn Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nils Nölke Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Robert Nuske Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Fabio Meloni Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Aksel Granhus Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Diego Giuliarelli Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Géraldine Derroire Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Minna Räty
Rankless by CCL
2026