Thomas Paul
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Ecology top 10%
- Environmental Engineering top 5%
- Insect Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Mark O. KimberleyPeter N. BeetsMichael S. WattJonathan P. DashJustin MorgenrothGrant D. PearseN. J. LedgardDavid M. Richardson
- Topics
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (14 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (14 papers)Forest ecology and management (13 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaRemote Sensing of EnvironmentBiological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
- Partner nations
- New ZealandAustraliaChile
In The Last Decade
Thomas Paul
35 papers receiving 562 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 301
- Global and Planetary Change 234
- Ecology 205
- Environmental Engineering 189
- Insect Science 186
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Paul
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Paul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Paul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Paul more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Paul
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Paul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Paul. The network helps show where Thomas Paul may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Paul
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Paul. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Paul based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Paul. Thomas Paul is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | Maximum likelihood multiple imputation: A more efficient approach to repairing and analyzing incomplete data | 2 |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 19 | 27 | |
| 20 | Re-examination of recent loss of indigenous cover in New Zealand and the relative contributions of different land uses. | 25 |
About Thomas Paul
Thomas Paul is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Insect Science and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 38 papers that have together received 587 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (14 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (14 papers) and Forest ecology and management (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (301 citations), Insect Science (186 citations) and Environmental Engineering (189 citations). Thomas Paul has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Mark O. Kimberley, Peter N. Beets, Michael S. Watt, Jonathan P. Dash, Justin Morgenroth, Grant D. Pearse, N. J. Ledgard, David M. Richardson, Agostina Torres and Romina D. Dimarco. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Remote Sensing of Environment and Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.