Malcolm Booth

551 total citations
22 papers, 198 citations indexed

About

Malcolm Booth is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Malcolm Booth has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 198 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 5 papers in Surgery and 5 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. Recurrent topics in Malcolm Booth's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (4 papers) and Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers). Malcolm Booth is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (4 papers) and Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers). Malcolm Booth collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Malcolm Booth's co-authors include David Hewitt, Rachel Kearns, Sheila A.M. McLean, John Kinsella, Xizhong Cui, Lindsay Donaldson, Peter Q. Eichacker, Junfeng Sun, Malcolm Sim and Andrew Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Emerging infectious diseases, Knowledge-Based Systems and American Journal of Infection Control.

In The Last Decade

Malcolm Booth

22 papers receiving 189 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Malcolm Booth United Kingdom 10 55 40 38 34 32 22 198
Aaron D. Storms United States 9 28 0.5× 21 0.5× 61 1.6× 26 0.8× 168 5.3× 16 302
Erika P. Plata–Menchaca Spain 9 69 1.3× 18 0.5× 32 0.8× 15 0.4× 107 3.3× 28 259
Donald Dietz United States 7 93 1.7× 24 0.6× 15 0.4× 6 0.2× 131 4.1× 10 409
Thomas P Hellyer United Kingdom 7 128 2.3× 19 0.5× 7 0.2× 13 0.4× 95 3.0× 14 243
Lisa Stephens United States 10 5 0.1× 27 0.7× 106 2.8× 15 0.4× 30 0.9× 20 360
C. Andréjak France 12 24 0.4× 19 0.5× 27 0.7× 8 0.2× 212 6.6× 26 357
Pontus Hedberg Sweden 10 39 0.7× 20 0.5× 29 0.8× 4 0.1× 136 4.3× 29 355
Radj Cally France 6 85 1.5× 35 0.9× 6 0.2× 5 0.1× 102 3.2× 13 355
Maria Dans United States 6 8 0.1× 43 1.1× 117 3.1× 57 1.7× 30 0.9× 10 378
Wenjuan Wu China 8 35 0.6× 23 0.6× 6 0.2× 7 0.2× 56 1.8× 25 292

Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm Booth. The network helps show where Malcolm Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Malcolm Booth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Malcolm Booth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Malcolm Booth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Malcolm Booth. Malcolm Booth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hewitt, David, Michael J. H. Ratcliffe, & Malcolm Booth. (2021). The FRAIL-FIT 30 Study – Factors influencing 30-day mortality in frail patients admitted to ICU: A retrospective observational cohort study. Journal of the Intensive Care Society. 23(2). 150–161. 7 indexed citations
2.
Pierini, Alessio, et al.. (2021). Ultrasound-guided placement of an anchor wire or injection of methylene blue to aid in the intraoperative localization and excision of peripheral lymph nodes in dogs and cats. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 260(S1). S75–S82. 8 indexed citations
3.
Booth, Malcolm, et al.. (2020). Incomplete pentalogy of Cantrell in a Border terrier puppy. Veterinary Record Case Reports. 8(4). 3 indexed citations
5.
Booth, Malcolm, et al.. (2019). Use of computed tomography in the diagnosis of caecal inversion in a dog and a cat. Veterinary Record Case Reports. 7(2). 2 indexed citations
6.
Smith, Andrew, et al.. (2016). Mortality in intensive care: The impact of bacteremia and the utility of systemic inflammatory response syndrome. American Journal of Infection Control. 44(11). 1291–1295. 14 indexed citations
7.
Cui, Xizhong, Leisha D. Nolen, Junfeng Sun, et al.. (2016). Analysis of Anthrax Immune Globulin Intravenous with Antimicrobial Treatment in Injection Drug Users, Scotland, 2009–2010. Emerging infectious diseases. 23(1). 56–65. 16 indexed citations
8.
Daniel, Malcolm, et al.. (2015). Details behind the dots: How different intensive care units used common and contrasting methods to prevent ventilator associated pneumonia. BMJ Quality Improvement Reports. 4(1). u207660.w3069–u207660.w3069. 10 indexed citations
9.
Booth, Malcolm, Lindsay Donaldson, Xizhong Cui, et al.. (2014). ConfirmedBacillus anthracisInfection among Persons Who Inject Drugs, Scotland, 2009–2010. Emerging infectious diseases. 20(9). 1452–1463. 26 indexed citations
10.
Docking, Robert, et al.. (2014). Comorbidity and Intensive Care Outcome — A Multivariable Analysis. Journal of the Intensive Care Society. 15(3). 205–212. 9 indexed citations
11.
Krige, Anton, Natalie Pattison, Malcolm Booth, et al.. (2013). Co-Enrolment to Intensive Care Studies – A UK Perspective. Journal of the Intensive Care Society. 14(2). 103–106. 6 indexed citations
12.
Booth, Malcolm, et al.. (2011). Unsuitable for the Intensive Care Unit: What Happens Next?. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 14(8). 899–903. 6 indexed citations
13.
Appleton, Richard, et al.. (2011). Rehabilitation within Scottish Intensive Care Units: A National Survey. Journal of the Intensive Care Society. 12(3). 221–227. 16 indexed citations
14.
McCoubrey, J., et al.. (2010). A pilot study of surveillance of intensive care unit associated infections in Scotland. Journal of Infection Prevention. 11(1). 24–26. 2 indexed citations
15.
Moss, Laura, Derek Sleeman, Malcolm Sim, et al.. (2009). Ontology-driven hypothesis generation to explain anomalous patient responses to treatment. Knowledge-Based Systems. 23(4). 309–315. 11 indexed citations
16.
Kearns, Rachel & Malcolm Booth. (2009). Oral Hygiene Practices in Scottish Intensive Care Units – a National Survey. Journal of the Intensive Care Society. 10(2). 155–157. 16 indexed citations
17.
Booth, Malcolm, et al.. (2009). Survey of Family-Witnessed Brain Stem Death Testing in Intensive Care Units. Journal of the Intensive Care Society. 10(4). 282–284. 2 indexed citations
18.
Booth, Malcolm. (2007). Informed Consent in Emergency Research: A Contradiction in Terms. Science and Engineering Ethics. 13(3). 351–359. 18 indexed citations
19.
Kinsella, John & Malcolm Booth. (2007). Ethical Framework for End of Life Decisions in Intensive Care in the UK. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 2 indexed citations
20.
Booth, Malcolm. (1997). 8 Ethical and legal aspects of burns care. Baillière s Clinical Anaesthesiology. 11(3). 497–511. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026