Natalie Richards

542 total citations
16 papers, 283 citations indexed

About

Natalie Richards is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Richards has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 283 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in General Health Professions, 3 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Natalie Richards's work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers). Natalie Richards is often cited by papers focused on Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers). Natalie Richards collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Natalie Richards's co-authors include Elisa Giulia Liberati, Graham Martin, Mary Dixon‐Woods, Janet Willars, Jennie Parker, Nicola Boydell, David A. Scott, Peter B. Jones, Vanessa Pinfold and Ian Hudson and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, BMJ and Australasian Journal of Paramedicine.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Richards

14 papers receiving 279 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Natalie Richards United Kingdom	8	133	119	81	35	34	16	283
Alex Fauer United States	8	88 0.7×	133 1.1×	61 0.8×	14 0.4×	43 1.3×	27	326
Scott McCain United Kingdom	6	202 1.5×	121 1.0×	82 1.0×	14 0.4×	15 0.4×	14	299
Nicole Restauri United States	7	220 1.7×	174 1.5×	72 0.9×	11 0.3×	40 1.2×	23	382
Meichen Du China	7	154 1.2×	170 1.4×	53 0.7×	9 0.3×	23 0.7×	9	373
Yaser Moradi Iran	10	144 1.1×	163 1.4×	48 0.6×	11 0.3×	24 0.7×	38	337
Szymon Szemik Poland	9	182 1.4×	73 0.6×	41 0.5×	15 0.4×	12 0.4×	20	305
Abdullah Algunmeeyn Jordan	8	114 0.9×	82 0.7×	31 0.4×	13 0.4×	15 0.4×	29	222
James N. Woodruff United States	12	198 1.5×	101 0.8×	140 1.7×	19 0.5×	12 0.4×	32	388
Ushasi Naha United States	5	298 2.2×	280 2.4×	32 0.4×	24 0.7×	78 2.3×	12	442
Irene Ngune Australia	10	126 0.9×	103 0.9×	69 0.9×	6 0.2×	30 0.9×	39	322

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Richards

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Richards's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Richards with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Richards more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Richards

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Richards. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Richards. The network helps show where Natalie Richards may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Richards

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Richards. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Richards based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Richards. Natalie Richards is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

16 of 16 papers shown

Schofield, Penelope, Stephen Quinn, Natalie Richards, et al.. (2025). An Online Treatment Decision Aid for Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer Eligible for Active Surveillance and Their Partners Increases the Uptake of Active Surveillance: The Navigate Randomised Controlled Trial. European Urology Oncology. 8(5). 1227–1236.

Liberati, Elisa Giulia, Sarah Kelly, Annabel Price, et al.. (2025). Diagnostic inequalities relating to physical healthcare among people with mental health conditions: a systematic review. EClinicalMedicine. 80. 103026–103026. 1 indexed citations

Lindsay, Daniel, Penelope Schofield, Dorean Nabukalu, et al.. (2024). The impact of management option on out-of-pocket costs and perceived financial burden among men with localised prostate cancer in Australia within 6 months of diagnosis. Australian Health Review. 48(2). 172–181.

Lamé, Guillaume, Elisa Giulia Liberati, Jenni Burt, et al.. (2023). Why is safety in intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring so hard? A qualitative study combining human factors/ergonomics and social science analysis. BMJ Quality & Safety. 33(4). 246–256. 8 indexed citations

Liberati, Elisa Giulia, et al.. (2023). Tackling the erosion of compassion in acute mental health services. BMJ. 382. e073055–e073055. 7 indexed citations

Schofield, Penelope, Amelia Hyatt, Mark Frydenberg, et al.. (2023). Co‐designing an online treatment decision aid for men with low‐risk prostate cancer: Navigate. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 5(1). 121–141. 4 indexed citations

Richards, Natalie, et al.. (2023). Machine learning algorithms for deeper understanding and better design of composite adhesive joints. Materials Today Communications. 34. 105428–105428. 12 indexed citations

Liberati, Elisa Giulia, Natalie Richards, Jennie Parker, et al.. (2022). Qualitative study of candidacy and access to secondary mental health services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Science & Medicine. 296. 114711–114711. 40 indexed citations

Richards, Natalie. (2022). The impact of remote care on burden of treatment. BMJ. 377. o1579–o1579. 3 indexed citations

10.

Liberati, Elisa Giulia, Natalie Richards, Janet Willars, et al.. (2021). A qualitative study of experiences of NHS mental healthcare workers during the Covid-19 pandemic. BMC Psychiatry. 21(1). 250–250. 88 indexed citations

11.

Liberati, Elisa Giulia, Natalie Richards, Jennie Parker, et al.. (2021). Remote care for mental health: qualitative study with service users, carers and staff during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Open. 11(4). e049210–e049210. 84 indexed citations

12.

Schofield, Penelope, Karla Gough, Amelia Hyatt, et al.. (2021). Navigate: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of an online treatment decision aid for men with low-risk prostate cancer and their partners. Trials. 22(1). 49–49. 9 indexed citations

13.

Scheer, Jan W. van der, Mark Woodward, Tim Draycott, et al.. (2021). Correction to: How to specify healthcare process improvements collaboratively using rapid, remote consensus-building: a frame work and a case study of its application. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 21(1). 1 indexed citations

14.

Richards, Natalie & Ian Hudson. (2016). UK medicines regulation: responding to current challenges. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 82(6). 1471–1476. 14 indexed citations

15.

Cousins, David, et al.. (2015). Initiatives to Identify and Mitigate Medication Errors in England. Drug Safety. 38(4). 349–357. 11 indexed citations

16.

Richards, Natalie, et al.. (2012). The Chronic Care for Aboriginal People program in NSW. New South Wales Public Health Bulletin. 23(4). 77–77. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact