Tessa Bent
- Linguistics and Language top 0.5%
- Linguistic Variation and Morphology 25
-
- Phonetics and Phonology Research 55
- Signal Processing top 1%
- Speech and Audio Processing 18
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation 19
-
- Language Development and Disorders 11
- Reading and Literacy Development 4
-
- Speech Recognition and Synthesis 12
-
- Noise Effects and Management 7
- Co-authors
- Ann R. BradlowRachael Frush HoltBruce L. SmithMelissa M. Baese‐BerkBeverly A. WrightStephanie A. BorrieDavid B. PisoniRachel Hayes‐Harb
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Tessa Bent
63 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Linguistics and Language 794
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.6k
- Signal Processing 508
- Cognitive Neuroscience 850
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 483
Countries citing papers authored by Tessa Bent
This map shows the geographic impact of Tessa Bent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tessa Bent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tessa Bent more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tessa Bent
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tessa Bent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tessa Bent. The network helps show where Tessa Bent may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tessa Bent, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 25 | |
| 6 | Evaluating the Effectiveness of Teaching Assistants in Active Learning Classrooms. | 2020 | 3 |
| 7 | 2018 | 54 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 32 | |
| 11 | Individual differences in perception of unfamiliar speech. | 2015 | 4 |
| 12 | Development of perceptual flexibility. | 2015 | 2 |
| 13 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 46 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 33 | |
| 16 | Perceptual Dimensions of Nonnative Speech. | 2011 | 5 |
| 17 | 2011 | 14 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 100 | |
| 19 | Perceptual adaptation to non-native speechbreakdown → | 2007 | 541 |
| 20 | 2006 | 109 |
About Tessa Bent
Tessa Bent is a scholar working on Linguistics and Language, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Signal Processing, having authored 68 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (55 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (25 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (19 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (18 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (12 papers), Language Development and Disorders (11 papers), Noise Effects and Management (7 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (794 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.6k citations) and Signal Processing (508 citations). Tessa Bent has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Ann R. Bradlow, Rachael Frush Holt, Bruce L. Smith, Melissa M. Baese‐Berk, Beverly A. Wright, Stephanie A. Borrie, David B. Pisoni, Rachel Hayes‐Harb, Jennifer Hay and Kristin J. Van Engen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.