Stacy Smith
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 2
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 1
-
- Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression 2
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Media Influence and Health 3
-
- Epilepsy research and treatment 2
-
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 1
-
- Neural dynamics and brain function 1
-
- Child Welfare and Adoption 1
- Co-authors
- W. James PotterMatthew BamblingWendy ReidRobert KingChris LloydJohn RobstDale KunkelCaroline Scott
- Journals
- Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media (2 papers)Journal of Religion and Health (1 paper)Journal of Communication (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Stacy Smith
10 papers receiving 262 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Applied Psychology 90
- Social Psychology 82
- Clinical Psychology 79
- Literature and Literary Theory 39
- Communication 23
Countries citing papers authored by Stacy Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Stacy Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacy Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacy Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stacy Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacy Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacy Smith. The network helps show where Stacy Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stacy Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 46 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 142 | |
| 7 | Coverage in Context: How Thoroughly the News Media Report Five Key Children's Issues. | 2002 | 12 |
| 8 | 2000 | 40 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 28 | |
| 11 | Very high frequency rhythmic activity during seeg suppression in frontal lobe epilepsy | 1991 | 1 |
About Stacy Smith
Stacy Smith is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Gender Studies, Literature and Literary Theory, Psychiatry and Mental health and Social Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 292 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Influence and Health (3 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (2 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (2 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Neural dynamics and brain function (1 paper) and Child Welfare and Adoption (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (90 citations), Social Psychology (82 citations), Clinical Psychology (79 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (39 citations) and Communication (23 citations). Stacy Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include W. James Potter, Matthew Bambling, Wendy Reid, Robert King, Chris Lloyd, John Robst, Dale Kunkel, Caroline Scott, Edward Donnerstein and William Harkness. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, Journal of Religion and Health, Journal of Communication, American Journal of Health Promotion and Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.