Erica Biely

978 total citations
12 papers, 686 citations indexed

About

Erica Biely is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Literature and Literary Theory and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Erica Biely has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 686 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Gender Studies, 4 papers in Literature and Literary Theory and 3 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Erica Biely's work include Gender, Feminism, and Media (6 papers), Media Influence and Health (4 papers) and Media Studies and Communication (3 papers). Erica Biely is often cited by papers focused on Gender, Feminism, and Media (6 papers), Media Influence and Health (4 papers) and Media Studies and Communication (3 papers). Erica Biely collaborates with scholars based in United States and Israel. Erica Biely's co-authors include Dale Kunkel, Edward Donnerstein, Keren Eyal, Sara J. Morgan, Robin L. Nabi, Carmen Stitt, Debra A. Lieberman, Kirstie M. Farrar, Victoria Rideout and Lara Zwarun and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Communication, The Journal of Sex Research and Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media.

In The Last Decade

Erica Biely

12 papers receiving 585 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Erica Biely United States	11	380	215	212	193	171	12	686
Nancy L. Buerkel‐Rothfuss United States	11	289 0.8×	183 0.9×	128 0.6×	109 0.6×	166 1.0×	30	624
Susannah R. Stern United States	13	269 0.7×	188 0.9×	404 1.9×	76 0.4×	140 0.8×	17	766
Yuki Fujioka United States	15	212 0.6×	255 1.2×	550 2.6×	90 0.5×	274 1.6×	20	902
Beth T. Bell United Kingdom	13	166 0.4×	116 0.5×	305 1.4×	382 2.0×	102 0.6×	28	732
Jean Kilbourne United States	6	249 0.7×	48 0.2×	130 0.6×	145 0.8×	101 0.6×	12	543
Johanna M. F. van Oosten Netherlands	17	397 1.0×	37 0.2×	424 2.0×	357 1.8×	191 1.1×	26	765
Veronica Hefner United States	11	180 0.5×	123 0.6×	164 0.8×	212 1.1×	45 0.3×	21	513
Kimberly Bissell United States	15	266 0.7×	92 0.4×	362 1.7×	168 0.9×	39 0.2×	31	716
Catharine Lumby Australia	15	391 1.0×	29 0.1×	358 1.7×	200 1.0×	90 0.5×	52	651
Katherine Hanson United States	12	109 0.3×	44 0.2×	301 1.4×	107 0.6×	313 1.8×	19	555

Countries citing papers authored by Erica Biely

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erica Biely's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erica Biely with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erica Biely more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erica Biely

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erica Biely. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erica Biely. The network helps show where Erica Biely may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erica Biely

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erica Biely. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erica Biely based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Erica Biely. Erica Biely is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Lieberman, Debra A., et al.. (2009). Digital Games for Young Children Ages Three to Six: From Research to Design. Computers in the Schools. 26(4). 299–313. 110 indexed citations

2.

Kunkel, Dale, Kirstie M. Farrar, Keren Eyal, et al.. (2007). Sexual Socialization Messages on Entertainment Television: Comparing Content Trends 1997–2002. Media Psychology. 9(3). 595–622. 62 indexed citations

3.

Eyal, Keren, et al.. (2007). Sexual Socialization Messages on Television Programs Most Popular Among Teens. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 51(2). 316–336. 29 indexed citations

4.

Kunkel, Dale, et al.. (2005). Sex on TV 4 2005: a Kaiser Family Foundation report.. 109 indexed citations

5.

Nabi, Robin L., Erica Biely, Sara J. Morgan, & Carmen Stitt. (2003). Reality-Based Television Programming and the Psychology of Its Appeal. Media Psychology. 5(4). 303–330. 150 indexed citations

6.

Farrar, Kirstie M., et al.. (2003). Sexual messages during prime-time programming. Sexuality & Culture. 7(3). 7–37. 41 indexed citations

7.

Kunkel, Dale, et al.. (2002). Coverage in Context: How Thoroughly the News Media Report Five Key Children's Issues.. 12 indexed citations

8.

Kunkel, Dale, et al.. (2002). Deciphering the V-Chip: An Examination of the Television Industry's Program Rating Judgments. Journal of Communication. 52(1). 112–138. 17 indexed citations

9.

Kunkel, Dale, et al.. (1999). Sex on TV: A Biennial Report to the Kaiser Family Foundation.. 103 indexed citations

10.

Kunkel, Dale, et al.. (1999). Sex on TV: A Biennial Report to the Kaiser Family Foundation. Executive Summary.. 3 indexed citations

11.

Kunkel, Dale, et al.. (1999). Sexual messages on television: Comparing findings from three studies. The Journal of Sex Research. 36(3). 230–236. 40 indexed citations

12.

Kunkel, Dale, et al.. (1998). Rating the TV Ratings: One Year Out. An Assessment of the Television Industry's Use of V-Chip Ratings. Report.. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact