Silas Taylor

561 total citations
23 papers, 286 citations indexed

About

Silas Taylor is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Silas Taylor has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 286 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 8 papers in Family Practice and 5 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Silas Taylor's work include Innovations in Medical Education (15 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (8 papers) and Medical Education and Admissions (7 papers). Silas Taylor is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (15 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (8 papers) and Medical Education and Admissions (7 papers). Silas Taylor collaborates with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Silas Taylor's co-authors include Boaz Shulruf, Rafael A. Calvo, Barbara‐Ann Adelstein, Lauren S. H. Chong, Kathryn McCabe, Karen M. Scott, Naseem Ahmadpour, Peter Harris, Daniel Tran and Samantha Bobba and has published in prestigious journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, Journal of Medical Internet Research and Medical Teacher.

In The Last Decade

Silas Taylor

20 papers receiving 281 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Silas Taylor Australia 10 183 86 74 44 36 23 286
Annemarie Spruijt Netherlands 9 187 1.0× 43 0.5× 81 1.1× 19 0.4× 19 0.5× 22 332
Shuh Shing Lee Singapore 11 143 0.8× 59 0.7× 29 0.4× 46 1.0× 13 0.4× 31 282
Ting Dong United States 13 282 1.5× 73 0.8× 87 1.2× 32 0.7× 34 0.9× 27 492
Manon Kluijtmans Netherlands 10 202 1.1× 110 1.3× 25 0.3× 26 0.6× 11 0.3× 22 370
Megan Anakin New Zealand 11 136 0.7× 43 0.5× 108 1.5× 25 0.6× 12 0.3× 36 260
Jo Horsburgh United Kingdom 9 145 0.8× 90 1.0× 18 0.2× 31 0.7× 10 0.3× 16 305
Rita Mojtahedzadeh Iran 12 96 0.5× 75 0.9× 15 0.2× 28 0.6× 27 0.8× 57 394
Farah Otaki United Arab Emirates 12 135 0.7× 145 1.7× 17 0.2× 12 0.3× 17 0.5× 32 393
Roghayeh Gandomkar Iran 10 160 0.9× 53 0.6× 33 0.4× 17 0.4× 17 0.5× 40 321
Ana Xie China 7 97 0.5× 41 0.5× 17 0.2× 14 0.3× 13 0.4× 12 259

Countries citing papers authored by Silas Taylor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Silas Taylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Silas Taylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Silas Taylor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Silas Taylor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Silas Taylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Silas Taylor. The network helps show where Silas Taylor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Silas Taylor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Silas Taylor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Silas Taylor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Silas Taylor. Silas Taylor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Arianpoor, Arash, Silas Taylor, Cherie Lucas, et al.. (2025). Development and Validation of a Tool for Evaluating Self-regulated and Self-directed Aptitudes of Learning (SELF-ReDiAL). Medical Science Educator. 35(5). 2429–2439.
2.
3.
Taylor, Silas, et al.. (2024). Insights into undergraduate medical student selection tools: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. 21. 22–22. 1 indexed citations
4.
Coffey, Michael J., Adam Bartlett, Millie Garg, et al.. (2024). Are serious games seriously good at preparing students for clinical practice?: A randomized controlled trial. Medical Teacher. 47(1). 126–133.
5.
Taylor, Silas, et al.. (2021). Empirical analysis comparing the tele-objective structured clinical examination and the in-person assessment in Australia. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. 18. 23–23. 6 indexed citations
6.
Taylor, Silas, et al.. (2021). Assessment methods and the validity and reliability of measurement tools in online objective structured clinical examinations: a systematic scoping review. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. 18. 11–11. 11 indexed citations
7.
Taylor, Silas, et al.. (2020). Designing for Helpers: Identifying new design opportunities for digital volunteerism. Proceedings of DRS. 3 indexed citations
8.
Taylor, Silas, et al.. (2020). “I Am Most Grateful.” Using Gratitude to Improve the Sense of Relatedness and Motivation for Online Volunteerism. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 36(14). 1325–1341. 19 indexed citations
9.
Shulruf, Boaz, et al.. (2019). Insights into student assessment outcomes in rural clinical campuses. BMC Medical Education. 19(1). 380–380. 3 indexed citations
10.
Taylor, Silas, et al.. (2019). Students' behavioural engagement in reviewing their tele-consultation feedback within an online clinical communication skills platform. Computers in Human Behavior. 94. 35–44. 13 indexed citations
11.
Adelstein, Barbara‐Ann, et al.. (2019). Definition of professionalism and tools for assessing professionalism in pharmacy practice: a systematic review. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. 16. 22–22. 29 indexed citations
12.
Taylor, Silas, et al.. (2019). Comparison of the effects of simulated patient clinical skill training and student roleplay on objective structured clinical examination performance among medical students in Australia. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. 16. 3–3. 17 indexed citations
13.
Shulruf, Boaz, Arvin Damodaran, Seán Kennedy, et al.. (2018). Enhancing the defensibility of examiners’ marks in high stake OSCEs. BMC Medical Education. 18(1). 10–10. 5 indexed citations
14.
Shulruf, Boaz, Barbara‐Ann Adelstein, Arvin Damodaran, et al.. (2018). Borderline grades in high stakes clinical examinations: resolving examiner uncertainty. BMC Medical Education. 18(1). 272–272. 5 indexed citations
15.
16.
Chong, Lauren S. H., et al.. (2018). Examiner seniority and experience are associated with bias when scoring communication, but not examination, skills in objective structured clinical examinations in Australia. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. 15. 17–17. 19 indexed citations
17.
Chong, Lauren S. H., et al.. (2017). The sights and insights of examiners in objective structured clinical examinations. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. 14. 34–34. 37 indexed citations
18.
Taylor, Silas & Boaz Shulruf. (2016). Australian medical students have fewer opportunities to do physical examination of peers of the opposite gender. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. 13. 42–42. 6 indexed citations
19.
20.
Scott, Karen M., et al.. (2016). EQClinic: a platform for learning communication skills in clinical consultations. Medical Education Online. 21(1). 31801–31801. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Annemarie Spruijt Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Shuh Shing Lee Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ting Dong Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Manon Kluijtmans Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Megan Anakin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jo Horsburgh Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rita Mojtahedzadeh Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Farah Otaki Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Roghayeh Gandomkar Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ana Xie
Rankless by CCL
2026