Sibel Damar
About
In The Last Decade
Sibel Damar
6 papers receiving 297 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Biotechnology 189
- Food Science 97
- Biomedical Engineering 81
- Animal Science and Zoology 69
- Biochemistry 37
Countries citing papers authored by Sibel Damar
This map shows the geographic impact of Sibel Damar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sibel Damar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sibel Damar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sibel Damar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sibel Damar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sibel Damar. The network helps show where Sibel Damar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sibel Damar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sibel Damar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sibel Damar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sibel Damar. Sibel Damar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 42 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | PROCESSING OF COCONUT WATER WITH HIGH PRESSURE CARBON DIOXIDE TECHNOLOGY | 4 |
| 6 | 211 | |
| 7 | 27 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.