Sheila King
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Nicholas JonesPaul DeanAlan CoweyPeter RedgraveMark DuxonPaul AzzopardiSusan OxburyJ.M. Oxbury
- Topics
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms (8 papers)Education Systems and Policy (6 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Sheila King
25 papers receiving 513 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Cognitive Neuroscience 220
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 159
- Social Psychology 104
- Education 83
- Behavioral Neuroscience 74
Countries citing papers authored by Sheila King
This map shows the geographic impact of Sheila King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sheila King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sheila King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sheila King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sheila King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sheila King. The network helps show where Sheila King may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sheila King
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sheila King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sheila King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sheila King. Sheila King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | An Investigation of Early Career Teachers' Perceptions of Professional Development Opportunities and Career Advancement for Teachers in Rural and Remote Queensland. | 1 |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 68 | |
| 10 | Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: pattern of use and health care system costs. | 8 |
| 11 | 40 | |
| 12 | 30 | |
| 13 | Partnerships, technology and teaching: celebrating the link between universities and rural communities | 5 |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 48 | |
| 18 | 32 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Sheila King
Sheila King is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience and Human Factors and Ergonomics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 547 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory and Neural Mechanisms (8 papers), Education Systems and Policy (6 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (74 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (220 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (159 citations). Sheila King has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas Jones, Paul Dean, Alan Cowey, Peter Redgrave, Mark Duxon, Paul Azzopardi, Susan Oxbury, J.M. Oxbury, Ivo A. Olivotto and Safa Shehab. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropsychologia, Psychopharmacology and European Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.